Who started it?

[Phaezed-Reality]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This would literally mean enchanters would have to be clearing their own charms in many cases. Fuck that with a rusty mace.

no of course not, you don't have to kill your charmed if you keep it charmed, but if you release your charm and move on to another camp, you did not clear the spawn. As is my interpretation.

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by DMN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This would literally mean enchanters would have to be clearing their own charms in many cases. Fuck that with a rusty mace.

Naw - if you keep a mob charmed you are claiming one of the mobs.

For instance - if I go to the spec island in Oasis, if I charm one that counts as "my mob"
another group entity or single player entity may claim another that i cannot touch and the rest are FTE. If you're keeping a mob charmed, you're owning and handling that spawn.

[ChooChoo Train]

Okay so he can be camped even easier then lol.

[Nirgon]

yeah you could camp him, unless they deem him a raid mob and require a zoneline rush for him

i hinted we might, we still could between tranixes and all, but decided since he drops epic pieces thats a bit much in making a point

or ya know, we still might, lets see how things go

[drackgon]

Dang Shoveler Kudos, Me like it!

But but VOTES! Must have more votes to support Big poppa!

[Phaezed-Reality]

Still trying to deny us full membership. I wonder what the motive is there.

[Albanwr]

Originally Posted by Phaezed-Reality [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still trying to deny us full membership. I wonder what the motive is there.

You don't want full membership, you are only interested in FGs.

[Finesteel]

Originally Posted by Phaezed-Reality [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still trying to deny us full membership. I wonder what the motive is there.

Your guild is you and 3 other dudes who role play as Erudites. IMO full membership you should be able to keep up with all of the content. For example ST (and any other UN guild) brings 40-70 folks to a PoH window and clears it in a timely manner, but you 4 want a window to yourself in which you’ll struggle to keep up with a small fraction of the mobs. Selfish.

[Nirgon]

Counter proposal to Yendor, trial by combat

[YendorLootmonkey]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Counter proposal to Yendor, trial by combat

My low INT brain just came up with a solution that gives you everything you want... a demonstration in good faith that you are in fact NOT a troll guild whose primary objective is just to "stir up shit on the new bluebie server", a slot on the FG rotation, and full voting rights on anything related to FGs, which is all the content you guys claim to have wanted all along per Ramal.

I can't speak for them, but I imagine that the UN would probably go for it, seeing as how they were originally going to give you a slot in the rotation anyway, but didn't understand why you should get full voting rights to matters pertaining all raiding content when you field like 2-3 people as tag-alongs on 7-day targets. I'm sure full voting rights on proposals pertaining to just FGs (the only content you care about) is a fair compromise for them.

So, please explain to all of us why you need voting privileges regarding content that does not concern you and for which you do not field more than 2-3 people?

Or is picking easy fights with low-HP rangers your high INT response now?