All Players are Raid Suspended Until Further Notice - Page 23

Disillusion · #**221** 01-03-2014, 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Need a clear definition of what the "problem" is though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Raid Scene
It continues to be an aggravating realization among CSR staff that 10% of the server population causes 90% of the problems. We are all for competition, but it needs to be fair competition. We are also all here for the same thing, to experience classic Everquest. The same guild monopolizing raid content for 2 years that they might not even need anymore is ridiculous, just to block other guilds from the chance of gearing up to take on the same end game content...

Elmarnieh · #**222** 01-03-2014, 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joroz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To be fair they should just eliminate the problem. It's not at all fair to ask volunteer staff to babysit raiders because they cannot play nice with each other. Lay out the bans, clear the queues and help players instead of mediating raid disputes.

Because raiders aren't players.

Alarti0001 · #**223** 01-03-2014, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your guild!

^^ This attitude

Rhambuk · #**224** 01-03-2014, 12:58 PM

In my opinion the #1 problem is population.

after that it comes to knowledge, we know every detail of every encounter.

a server split would help but only temporarily and put more stress on the csr team or they would have to recruit more people to deal with the new server.

drakelord · #**225** 01-03-2014, 01:01 PM

They could also increase the spawn rate and limit how many times a month a guild can clear an encounter, but I guess that wouldn't be very classic like.

Messianic · #**226** 01-03-2014, 01:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In my opinion the #1 problem is population.

after that it comes to knowledge, we know every detail of every encounter.

a server split would help but only temporarily and put more stress on the csr team or they would have to recruit more people to deal with the new server.

#1 problem is lack of resources to introduce velious in a timely manner. Everything else after that is secondary.

Alarti0001 · #**227** 01-03-2014, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rhambuk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In my opinion the #1 problem is population.

after that it comes to knowledge, we know every detail of every encounter.

a server split would help but only temporarily and put more stress on the csr team or they would have to recruit more people to deal with the new server.

#1 problem is no velious, and an extended kunark that allowed over 1000 60's. So ya pretty much.

radditsu · #**228** 01-03-2014, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

^^ This attitude

Aww

drakelord · #**229** 01-03-2014, 01:05 PM

I have a feeling it won't take more than a few months to max out on Velious anyway. There isn't a level cap increase, and no AA points, so once people get raid geared, it'll fly by.

jaybone · #**230** 01-03-2014, 01:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drakelord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have a feeling it won't take more than a few months to max out on Velious anyway. There isn't a level cap increase, and no AA points, so once people get raid geared, it'll fly by.

wtb luclin