![]() |
|
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Not that I like randos in my backyard, either | |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Yea we didn't forget how to go to the moon lol, the US lost interest and stomach for the funding. Later moon landings didn't even make primetime national television.
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
I believe America and many other nations and organizations have the technology required to return to the Moon and I hope to see it happen on television before I die, even if it's some insufferable billionaire's vanity project
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
maybe democrats are really just pissed off that they have to use gasoline engines for farm equipment instead of black people
they are still salty since they lost the war to keep black people in chains | ||
|
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
It's scandals like these that worry me about researchers and university alum throwing studies and jargon at people as proof of needing funding or theories or what not
ESPECIALLY those with surprising, sensationalistic, or provacitive results People can get so good at manipulating data that they can get away with it for years if not forever, likely in some cases I am actually far more likely to trust a study that comes with a conclusion like "this is all really minor stuff, it's not a big deal". Versus one that comes with a conclusion "THIS IS A REALLY BIG DEAL" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
To this day those 2 organizations are still too dumb to realize they show their obvious political bias by selectivity in who and what they choose to scrutinize | |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|