FE hacks TMO Batphone calls fake Trak, Trak spawns 3 minutes later.

[Loly Taa]

Originally Posted by baramur [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sounds like option had agro and was going to position mob for engage, and tmo went ahead and engaged preventing Fe from positioning trak into a favorable position to engage, thus interfering with options pull. Fe had fte its tmo responsibility to not engage until wipe or reset, not Fe responsibility to engage early before positioned.

Holy shit, congratulations; You are the dumbest fucking person on this forum.

[Nerosys]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If FE's and TMO's positions were reversed and brotos or amelinda were gms. TMO would be suspended for raid interference. Looks like FE might just lose the trak and avoid raid suspension.

If we had FTE would it not be you guys who interfered ? Confused

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Nerosys [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If we had FTE would it not be you guys who interfered ? Confused

If you had a raid force present and capable of killing trak. Also, your pullers repeatedly flopped and stood up playing with ftes with the sole purpose of fte sniping and no intention of engaging.

That is raid interference and used to be suspendable.

[arsenalpow]

This shit is exhausting to read.

[jpeute]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If FE's and TMO's positions were reversed and brotos or amelinda were gms. TMO would be suspended for raid interference. Looks like FE might just lose the trak and avoid raid suspension.

[Nerosys]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you had a raid force present and capable of killing trak. Also, your pullers repeatedly flopped and stood up playing with ftes with the sole purpose of fte sniping and no intention of engaging.

That is raid interference and used to be suspendable.

I was not there for this engage but my understanding is there was a raid force present and ready, i did not realize this was in dispute.

Say you are correct and the logs are somehow wrong is stall tanking now not a viable option anymore?

[Alarti0001]

Originally Posted by Nerosys [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I was not there for this engage but my understanding is there was a raid force present and ready, i did not realize this was in dispute.

Say you are correct and the logs are somehow wrong is stall tanking now not a viable option anymore?

Stall tanking is. However a stall tank maintains his position the the aggro list throughout the stall.

You also did not have a raid force present when TMO ran in you had 9 in zone. 4 of them being your flop crew.

[Kruel]

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Stall tanking is. However a stall tank maintains his position the the aggro list throughout the stall.

You also did not have a raid force present when TMO ran in you had 9 in zone. 4 of them being your flop crew.

I remember the good old days when IB would engage trak with 6-7 online with hopes of staying alive while others logged in. While 50 TMO watched us in all our glory kill him.

[Picks]

I guess no one is talking about the "lucky" batphone/coincidence. Instead of camping back out they just decided to form groups and kill juggs. You know .... for a bracer off the protector. Such bullshit.

[49shadesofgay]

Originally Posted by Kruel [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I remember the good old days when IB would engage trak with 6-7 online with hopes of staying alive while others logged in. While 50 TMO watched us in all our glory kill him.

IB bards used to pull dragons with 1-2 people in zone and have a raidforce present in the 2-3 minutes it took the dragon to get there.