Joke 6 Committee "Hearing"

[Rethalis]

Is there anything more pompous than an argument from authority?

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry pal, I hope you're not a lawyer. Not very persuasive.

"Bill told me Bob did this."

Effectively what she said. It matches none of the reasons you gave. Exclusions are quite specific and limited. Online degree?

Hearsay is perfectly admissible in an argument among the vulgate.

[Castle2.0]

The assistant to the maker of the rules told me that the rule maker said no to hearsay when he wrote the rules. I am somethingsomething credible, and a woman. I must be believed.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the maker of the rules

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parlia...epresentatives

Senate it's a chick. She's a 4 or 5.

[Castle2.0]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parlia...epresentatives

Senate it's a chick. She's a 4 or 5.

You missed the point again. I'm not saying what is "admissable" or not in political theatre "hearings." I am saying it is hearsay and wouldn't hold up in real hearing. But nice try to try to scrape back some credibility when your "it's an exception to hearsay" fell flat.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You missed the point again. I'm not saying what is "admissable" or not in political theatre "hearings." I am saying it is hearsay and wouldn't hold up in real hearing. But nice try to try to scrape back some credibility when your "it's an exception to hearsay" fell flat.

I never said it was an exception to hearsay.

I said it wasn't against the rules of the House chamber.

Which the Parliamentarian decides!

Shutup moron.

[Castle2.0]

I might be conflating you with cd288, another loser. My bad.

[Jibartik]

Originally Posted by Reiwa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I never said it was an exception to hearsay.

I said it wasn't against the rules of the House chamber.

Which the Parliamentarian decides!

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sorry pal, I hope you're not a lawyer. Not very persuasive.

"Bill told me Bob did this."

Effectively what she said. It matches none of the reasons you gave. Exclusions are quite specific and limited. Online degree?

As I said, just because you’re not able to understand my explanation because you have no idea about anything doesn’t make my explanation wrong lmao

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Castle2.0 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I might be conflating you with cd288, another loser. My bad.

Yes you are bad and also very dumb.