Anita Sarkeesian

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

dude, its a kickstarter, she said she would make videos... you think videos are cheap and not worth what people payed for.

Welcome to earth where you buy shit that breaks after...

that's life pal, its not a crime.

Also you didnt even back that shit, so what the fuck do you care.

Wrong. The kickstarter was to fund the research in the videos. Research that had 0 citations. As shown before, the few things that she did cite in her video were other groups' research that weren't even related to the topic or had been made before her kickstarter even happened.

You know you're wrong you're just so afraid to admit it you can't even form a coherent response.

Just stop.

[Champion_Standing]

Lol, anyone that thinks those shitty videos cost her anywhere near 150k to make is nuts. I could do the same shit with $50 worth of software and a cell phone.

[iruinedyourday]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wrong. The kickstarter was to fund the research in the videos. Research that had 0 citations. As shown before, the few things that she did cite in her video were other groups' research that weren't even related to the topic or had been made before her kickstarter even happened.

You know you're wrong you're just so afraid to admit it you can't even form a coherent response.

no man, she did not say "i will make video's and cite all my references" she said, " i will use the money to add to my research for my videos"

which means you are QQ about shit that you shouldn't even care about in the first place.

Facts are ya'll gamergate nerds are QQ about this shit cus shes calling you sexist and you are trying to get back at her.

But you, kaga, are especially bad because you make thread after thread about how the media jumps to conclusions about people being murdered by police, but you do exactly that about some random chick on the internet.

[Champion_Standing]

150k for research means sit around on my unemployed ass and troll twitter I guess.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

no man, she did not say "i will make video's and cite all my references" she said, "i will use the money to add to my research for my videos"

Except even your conservative interpretation of her kickstarter begging video is greater than what she actually did with the money. She did no research. She borrowed others' research which didn't cost her a penny. You still have not provided a shred of evidence for even a fraction of the $150,000 being spent where it was promised.

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

which means you are QQ about shit that you shouldn't even care about in the first place.

Facts are ya'll gamergate nerds are QQ about this shit cus shes calling you sexist and you are trying to get back at her.

Yes, I'm sure it has nothing to do with gaming journalism being a fucking mess or anything, "gamergate nerds" are just mad at one girl because girls don't belong in gaming. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

But you, kaga, are especially bad because you make thread after thread about how the media jumps to conclusions about people being murdered by police, but you do exactly that about some random chick on the internet.

You're missing that word 'evidence' again. I base my conclusions on the available evidence. You base yours on feelings. Don't conflate the two please.

[iruinedyourday]

The last people on earth that I would want reforming gaming journalism would be gamergate nerds...

You base your conclusion lack of evidence, something you think is wrong when its about something you disagree with and right when its something you personally agree with.

So you're a hypocrite.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The last people on earth that I would want reforming gaming journalism would be gamergate nerds...

I know right. The same way you don't want the ones with the biggest stake in any issue to be fixing it. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You base your conclusion lack of evidence,

Wrong again. I debunk your conclusions based on the lack of evidence. There is evidence for my conclusions.

Stop walking into the situation with pre-conceived notions and you might actually come to an informed decision instead of a decision based on feels.

Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

something you think is wrong when its about something you disagree with and right when its something you personally agree with.

I read this part six times before giving up. This is not English.

I think you are trying to say that I disagree with things I disagree with and agree with things I agree with, which is redundant and no does not make me a hypocrite. You on the other hand are a bonified hypocrite with your entire argument being the cry of: "Leave Anita alone!" instead of looking at any of the facts. In fact you are dismissing the only facts available.

[Gaffin 7.0]

i think you are a try hard and no one cares

[iruinedyourday]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[iruinedyourday]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]