Noble Dojorn Timers

[-Catherin-]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In light of Taken's repeated actions regarding the Overseers, TMO sees no reason to abide by the former agreement that was in place. We came to Taken yesterday with reason, suggesting that they are in a critical position to either stand down and be part of the solution by setting a precedent and not engaging or they could continue to exacerbate the problem by continuing to kill OoA's. Unfortunately, Taken chose the former.

In response, TMO will now begin keeping noble timer and engaging Noble as an FFA target and continuing on with the freeti cycle (Noble>Overseer>Hand) until further notice. We apologize in this unfortunate circumstance, but if we are to accept Taken's logic as to why they killed Overseer's than we must treat this situation in concordance to that line of rationale.

At least you are finally being honest about your intentions so I can give you respect where it is due for that.

I'll ask again though, where was this outrage last week, when Taken left the Overseer up in good faith and it was then killed? Once again, by a Guild who refuses to step forward, admit it, and agree that it will stop.

If you don't have that then you have no agreement anyways. So your attempt to make us look like the bad guys changes nothing.

[bktroost]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

In light of Taken's repeated actions regarding the Overseers, TMO sees no reason to abide by the former agreement that was in place. We came to Taken yesterday with reason, suggesting that they are in a critical position to either stand down and be part of the solution by setting a precedent and not engaging or they could continue to exacerbate the problem by continuing to kill OoA's. Unfortunately, Taken chose the former.

In response, TMO will now begin keeping noble timer and engaging Noble as an FFA target and continuing on with the freeti cycle (Noble>Overseer>Hand) until further notice. We apologize in this unfortunate circumstance, but if we are to accept Taken's logic as to why they killed Overseer's than we must treat this situation in concordance to that line of rationale.

I understand your perspective Unbrella. Can I make a suggestion? Might it be worth a go to say that we turn the entire server into an FFA FTE fest until we win this raid on ForumQuest? From this point forward its an FFA FTE (because it already is) and we actively attempt to get some full agreement from the GMs about enforcing the OOA hands off?

It seems Taken will not agree fully until we hear from a GM. TMO won't agree if Taken isn't and IB hasn't really fully committed. We can make a separate post with the changes that we want the GMs to enforce and ask that 1 officer from each guild only post *signed* on it to make it official. Once we get that signed off by every guild in the sky rotation we can get the GMs to see it (like a real petition) and give us the permission that this will go into effect on XX/XX date. Then we know precisely which date the changes are in effect and there will be no confusion whatsoever.

Until then, no one will need to worry about being called "Sky scums," or whatever else RnFs wants to throw around because we will all be of one mind.

Does that sounds workable?

[Erati]

All of Class R is agreeing to what TMO just laid out

we are much closer to a GM enforceable policy than you realize.

And this isnt additional work because ( I know it will be a shock) no one will kill the Overseers!

So they will barely have to do anything at all except during the oft chance someone DOES kill them...then finally someone will have to be accountable for their decision that affects the other 10 guilds.

[Ella`Ella]

I posted this in RnF, but please tell me what you see here...

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Artaenc]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I posted this in RnF, but please tell me what you see here...

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One OOA died of a heart attack and TMO didn't kill it?

[Erati]

TMO has access to encounter logs ?

[Erati]

Well to save people the trouble ( if that encounter log is 100% legit which it seems to be, cept why blackout stuff?)...
we can just play the 'it was all a misunderstanding card' from the last Overseer death kerfuffle that TMO/IB used !

( this is why we want GMs to sign off on our player agreement so the Taken shitbags can get suspended for killing Overseers )

[Ella`Ella]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

why blackout stuff?)...

Think it has the account name of the player that engaged.

[Erati]

Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Think it has the account name of the player that engaged.

Well at least the finger pointing and witch hunt can end so we can just this stupid thing official and hammered away

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=154977

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by Erati [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO has access to encounter logs ?