Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-13-2013, 05:00 AM
Godefroi Godefroi is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 406
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krissdu64 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Velious being the last expansion of the project, they are probably delaying it because once everything will be killed, people will move on and leave. The way they're working on everything else than Velious is a kind of proof of what i'm saying.
So you say the Server has max population even after 3 years of Kunark only because Velious is to be released?

As much as this could be true, I believe this 1000-3000 players base is the one that wants "permanent classic" as they view the real EQ nostalgic experience as Classic-Kunark-Velious.

I'm not really sure P99 would die once velious is released and beaten. I'm pretty sure a time locked server being released with the real time frame would challenge a lot of nostalgic players, as it wouldn't be as retarded as it is right now with mains and 3rd alts full VP.
  #2  
Old 09-13-2013, 06:02 AM
Godefroi Godefroi is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 406
Default

I do believe Velious is being intentionaly delayed as well, but not for worries about the server dying or anything else.

I believe it's being delayed because the staff himself (besides Nilbog) has lost interest in the project due to the intense CSR involved by its success.

Basically, what makes P99 successful is the little GM intervention, everything is contested, etc. Server is alive because achievements mean something.

On the other hand, it generates a lot of petitioning and drama. As much as raiders get bored of content, I can imagine how old it must be getting to go solve an FTE petition at Noble...

Either way, the staff doesn't want to regulate the server, and don't want to deal with the mass of petitioning it involves.

Imagine this with Velious. The amount of petitions would be 10 times higher. I just don't think they want to deal with it (and if you Watch latest Sirken's twitch, he states that he doesn't want "Headaches"). You got your answer pretty much.

It's a vicious circle.
  #3  
Old 09-13-2013, 10:12 AM
webrunner5 webrunner5 is offline
Planar Protector

webrunner5's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oxford, Ohio
Posts: 4,091
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krissdu64 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In TMO we have more and more people going for a break because we hardly find the motivation to kill the same content everytime... with no news about Velious at all. But yeah we're staying because of Velious and i think the majority of the server does too... for lots of different reasons.

After like 1 year of Velious, the server may not die completely, but just like in a serie, you enjoy it and talk about it until the last episode. Then you move on and forget it ...

There will be twinks everywhere, characters sales, money value will decrease and emblematic people that made the history of the server as we know it will be gone... At this point, i'm pretty sure Velious release is intentionnally delayed. For that reason and maybe others i didn't think about...

In any project, when you're that late in your delivery, you get more people to work on it, you keep your customers informed and explain why you're late etc... The fact that it's free to play shouldn't justify everything. They're not doing anything about it, so they don't want it to be released for now.
Very well stated. I find myself being in the forums more than in game lately. Kunark is getting pretty damn old. And like I have stated I am not really a big fan of Velious other than a couple of zones. And the top 2 or 3 guilds will have them tied up for a long time. Not looking too good for me in the long run on P1999.
  #4  
Old 09-12-2013, 06:19 PM
Lagaidh Lagaidh is offline
Fire Giant

Lagaidh's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 769
Default

I thought I'd pop in the forums and say "Hi", maybe ask folks what's new since I've been away for a month...

39th page...

Same stuff. And a lot of the same stuff.
__________________
Lagaidh Smif
Proud Paladin of the Rathe
  #5  
Old 09-13-2013, 10:47 AM
Porz Porz is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 389
Default

As old people leave new ones are just starting. And with the Velious release the server will not die. Didn't a gm mention a progression based server after its all said and done?
__________________
]
  #6  
Old 09-13-2013, 08:35 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Easy raiding scene fix: 1. Remove training in VP, 2. Have server repops 3-4 weeks apart, 3. Remove variance.


Removing variance would probably be my last choice out of these 3 options. But I think the first 2 options together would increase competition in the raid scene immensely, without adding too much work for devs/GMs.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #7  
Old 09-14-2013, 02:41 AM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

I don't think this server currently has a big enough staff capable of enforcing the current rules on this server, as evidenced by such things as FTE shouts being implemented, training still being allowed in VP 2 + years after kunark release, and the generally chaotic atmosphere on the server during raids or even in primetime exp zones.

There are people regularly breaking server rules going unpunished, and its getting old. Furthermore I think releasing velious prior to hammering out any problems with kunark would be detrimental to the box in general.

I mean who wants to log on when they have limited time to begin with, and there's a risk they will be trained repeatedly without any hope for recourse. If you aren't a solo class p99 becomes much more difficult because you end up having to rely on groups. When you are reliant on others, it takes time to get exp flowing, and you will be very disappointed when you put that time in only to have your session ruined by some asshole who trains without hesitation (intentionally or not) because there are no repercussions.


Sure, there was training on live which may have at times been inevitable. But repeatedly and blatantly training people was something that always went enforced on live.


Ps, I would support new GMs who's sole purpose was enforcing the servers rules fairly across guild lines, and one who displayed consistency with their decisions. There are many instances in the past where rules/rulings are changed and reversed on the fly or instances of one GM saying one thing and another GM saying something that is the complete opposite. Stuff like this needs to be minimalized, especially considering the level of trust amongst players for server staff members following past GM's indiscretions. Not trying to take a shot at any current GMs here but from what I've seen lately they have their plates full, p99 blue could probably use another 2 gms. One could be dedicated to raiding enforcement while the other handles enforcement of rules in any other situations. Of course this is an entirely different discussion altogether. This is just my observations of the current situation regaring the servers rules, suprisingly in terms of raiding AND non-raiding situations.


For example, I mean just 2 weeks ago I watched a monk train a guildy 4 times (3 of which caught on fraps) blatantly intentionally, petition was made and fraps submitted. Gm response was that fraps isn't used as evidence by gms when trying to determine if a train was intentional. This is the exact opposite of what another GM regularly states in situations identical to this one. Perhaps current GMs are like too compartmentalized, because it seems on this occasion they were in direct contradiction of one another.


I just really hope some kind of reform is made in regards to enforcement of rules and consistency of rules before velious drops, otherwise it is going to be utter anarchy there.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
Last edited by Tasslehofp99; 09-14-2013 at 02:43 AM.. Reason: spell checking and fact checking broz
  #8  
Old 09-14-2013, 08:27 AM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I don't think this server currently has a big enough staff capable of enforcing the current rules on this server, as evidenced by such things as FTE shouts being implemented, training still being allowed in VP 2 + years after kunark release, and the generally chaotic atmosphere on the server during raids or even in primetime exp zones.

There are people regularly breaking server rules going unpunished, and its getting old. Furthermore I think releasing velious prior to hammering out any problems with kunark would be detrimental to the box in general.

I mean who wants to log on when they have limited time to begin with, and there's a risk they will be trained repeatedly without any hope for recourse. If you aren't a solo class p99 becomes much more difficult because you end up having to rely on groups. When you are reliant on others, it takes time to get exp flowing, and you will be very disappointed when you put that time in only to have your session ruined by some asshole who trains without hesitation (intentionally or not) because there are no repercussions.


Sure, there was training on live which may have at times been inevitable. But repeatedly and blatantly training people was something that always went enforced on live.


Ps, I would support new GMs who's sole purpose was enforcing the servers rules fairly across guild lines, and one who displayed consistency with their decisions. There are many instances in the past where rules/rulings are changed and reversed on the fly or instances of one GM saying one thing and another GM saying something that is the complete opposite. Stuff like this needs to be minimalized, especially considering the level of trust amongst players for server staff members following past GM's indiscretions. Not trying to take a shot at any current GMs here but from what I've seen lately they have their plates full, p99 blue could probably use another 2 gms. One could be dedicated to raiding enforcement while the other handles enforcement of rules in any other situations. Of course this is an entirely different discussion altogether. This is just my observations of the current situation regaring the servers rules, suprisingly in terms of raiding AND non-raiding situations.


For example, I mean just 2 weeks ago I watched a monk train a guildy 4 times (3 of which caught on fraps) blatantly intentionally, petition was made and fraps submitted. Gm response was that fraps isn't used as evidence by gms when trying to determine if a train was intentional. This is the exact opposite of what another GM regularly states in situations identical to this one. Perhaps current GMs are like too compartmentalized, because it seems on this occasion they were in direct contradiction of one another.


I just really hope some kind of reform is made in regards to enforcement of rules and consistency of rules before velious drops, otherwise it is going to be utter anarchy there.
lol i liked seeing your edit for fact checking.
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #9  
Old 09-14-2013, 09:37 AM
kaev kaev is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 1,907
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krissdu64 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
p99 raiding isn't broken
Close, but no cigar. To be truly :classic: you must say:

Quote:
p99 raiding is working as intended
  #10  
Old 09-14-2013, 10:40 AM
Rhambuk Rhambuk is offline
Planar Protector

Rhambuk's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maine
Posts: 3,034
Default

Only read the title. Very accurate, but P1999 itself is nothing like classic. Just the setting.....
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Haynar View Post
Don't let the door hit you on the way out.

Oh yea .... Piss Off.

H
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:44 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.