NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How are you not understanding that the movie was a fictional story that real anti-trafficking authorities are saying the movie is hurting their endeavors to inform the public about the problem of child abuse. Your parroting is helping hyping up a bunch of rightwing extremists who encourage raids on Wayfairs and pizza restaurants to find fictitious dungeons.

And when called out with news reports with statements from these professional anti-trafficking authorities statements your immediate response is fake news.

You really are your own worst enemy.

Lol you mean people are trying to discredit the hyper-successful right wing movie? People never lie about the right wing! That would be crazy!

This movie about sex trafficking being bad is hurting our ability to... inform the public about the problem what in the hell are you talking about? What does that even mean? This is as much of a stretch as saying that stupid country song is about lynching or whatever retarded nonsense.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Lol you mean people are trying to discredit the hyper-successful right wing movie? People never lie about the right wing! That would be crazy!

This movie about sex trafficking being bad is hurting our ability to... inform the public about the problem what in the hell are you talking about? What does that even mean? This is as much of a stretch as saying that stupid country song is about lynching or whatever retarded nonsense.

consulting alt right podcasts again?

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This movie fires up members of their base but if it was a movie about saving children from abusive religious figures this movie would be condemned.

The movie “took creative liberties in depicting the different methods of child trafficking.”

"Songs of Freedom" offers a "false perception" of child trafficking that experts worry could further harm the real victims.

The movie starts by showing children snatch up at local business and out in the open.
Which does happen of course.

But more underage are trafficked through drugs or run aways situations which isn't touched on (well when focusing on the US).

In reality, some are throwaway kids. They are kicked out of their homes and trade sex for food and a place to stay, and end up being trafficked by a pimp. In a lot of these cases, the trafficker starts out calling themselves their boyfriend or girlfriend.

Some of the victims have a family members that pushed the child into a trafficked situation for either drugs or in some cases shelter and food.

Sound of Freedom almost exclusively focuses on very young children, the majority of child trafficking victims are adolescents or teenagers.

In fact, a report from the Counter-Trafficking Data Collaborative states that 67 percent of children trafficked are between the ages of 15 and 17.

Generally, young people end up in trafficking situations because their family is in incredible poverty, because of political unrest, because the child is being rejected by their family for their sexual orientation or gender identity or any number of things.

Lack of focus on tragic cases like these, in favor of more dramatic narratives about international rescue missions and shadowy strangers abducting kids, has resulted in a skewed perception of child trafficking.

Nationalizing a movie from a conspiracy cultivator to re-energize a base who has their own abusive occult is going to only inspire more crazed MAGA gun enthusiastic fanatics spreading horrible rumors about Wayfair or pizza restaurants.


.

[Ooloo]

Oh wow! So, a completely retarded explanation. They didn't focus on the RIGHT kind of sex trafficking so it's bad!!! Grrr! Right wing movie bad! Gronk no like!!

Total joke. You aren't a serious person.

[Ooloo]

Boy I sure do remember the public outcry when Terminator 2 came out; it was a FICTIONAL story that gave the public a SKEWED understanding of AI! Booooooo!!!!

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol jesus

kinda negates the whole pursuit of aesthetics thing imo

Rockefeller Republican, as they used to say. Back before ye ol Southern Strategy.

History is just not flattering to certain folks. Why did Republicans go from high brow tycoons to low brow tycoons?

It's just damn hard to win elections on flat taxes and privatized retirement. All this culture war stuff is just the back up plan to get votes. Kinda works!

Why any working man would want to see any of that is beyond me, but ya'll vote!

When full SS gets raised to 72 I hope all these conserva-gnomes don't come crying to me. I'll be lookingoodfeelingood.gif.

We need workers. But how much time you do is up to you.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rockefeller Republican, as they used to say. Back before ye ol Southern Strategy.

History is just not flattering to certain folks. Why did Republicans go from high brow tycoons to low brow tycoons?

It's just damn hard to win elections on flat taxes and privatized retirement. All this culture war stuff is just the back up plan to get votes. Kinda works!

Why any working man would want to see any of that is beyond me, but ya'll vote!

When full SS gets raised to 72 I hope all these conserva-gnomes don't come crying to me. I'll be lookingoodfeelingood.gif.

We need workers. But how much time you do is up to you.

Isn't SS funded by a flat tax? 🤔

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Rockefeller Republican, as they used to say. Back before ye ol Southern Strategy.

History is just not flattering to certain folks. Why did Republicans go from high brow tycoons to low brow tycoons?

It's just damn hard to win elections on flat taxes and privatized retirement. All this culture war stuff is just the back up plan to get votes. Kinda works!

Why any working man would want to see any of that is beyond me, but ya'll vote!

When full SS gets raised to 72 I hope all these conserva-gnomes don't come crying to me. I'll be lookingoodfeelingood.gif.

We need workers. But how much time you do is up to you.

Not just kinda works but really works well. It'd so god damn sad watching people vote against their own best interest, except most of them are doing it out of hatred or fear, so well-deserved imo. Sucks for the rest of us

We could have Republicans like Eisenhower and instead we get William Dudley Pelley

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not just kinda works but really works well. It'd so god damn sad watching people vote against their own best interest, except most of them are doing it out of hatred or fear, so well-deserved imo. Sucks for the rest of us

We could have Republicans like Eisenhower and instead we get William Dudley Pelley

Why would Eisenhower be better?

[Ripp]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh wow! So, a completely retarded explanation. They didn't focus on the RIGHT kind of sex trafficking so it's bad!!! Grrr! Right wing movie bad! Gronk no like!!

Total joke. You aren't a serious person.

Amazing, isn't it? And very disturbing.

Over the past few weeks I've learned that Liberals:

• Hate America
• Hate law and order
• Hate anyone who speaks out against child trafficking
• Hate anyone who speaks out against sex crimes
• Hate people who talk about the above and want them cancelled or worse
• Hate anyone who tries to exchange discourse counter to their narratives

What did I miss?

At this point I think we should stop calling them Liberals and calling them by what they really represent. Fascist, Socialist Communists. Or just evil.

I'm not shocked often these days but I really have been these past few weeks. The good thing is that people are waking up to their insanity. The bad news is I believe it's too late. It's all too far gone now.

[Lune]

^ Brainwashed cultist

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Why would Eisenhower be better?

In short, he was a patriot and governed accordingly. Current MAGA GOP would be in the slammer for sedition just like Pelley if it was 1942