Taken - Sev

[Locust]

Originally Posted by Derubael [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

....Did you guys forget that BDA didn't get suspended for this, but instead had their loots deleted...?

I don't remember there being a clarion call to suspend BDA after that encounter. In fact, BDA argued hard that they shouldn't have their loot deleted at all.

But there was definitely not a suspension. We let BDA off with a warning.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this never happened. Supremacy (the bard, in FE) stalled draco as the only member of his guild until reinforcements arrived. BDA tried to peel unsuccessfully. we never killed it or received loot.

we were told that had we killed draco we would have eaten a suspension, and that we would be let off with a warning for raid interference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEG4pHUegHw

[Derubael]

Originally Posted by Locust [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

this never happened. Supremacy (the bard, in FE) stalled draco as the only member of his guild until reinforcements arrived. BDA tried to peel unsuccessfully. we never killed it or received loot.

we were told that had we killed draco we would have eaten a suspension, and that we would be let off with a warning for raid interference.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEG4pHUegHw

Oh sorry, you're right - BDA peeled, FE took it back, and BDA got a warning over it. Regardless, if you want to draw parallels, BDA didn't get suspended for that encounter

[Relbaic]

Originally Posted by Exmo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I still think the best Analogy to this situation is the BDA Suspension for Peeling off what BDA thought was a Stall without allowing the mob (CT? Draco? I don't remember) to reset.

BDA was rightfully suspended and the GM's arguement was that, even if it was a stall, BDA wasn't allowed to make that call, and should never kill anything without an FTE Message. So the Illegal Pull by a tracker doesn't matter. The kill without an FTE Shout should mean a suspension.

Draco, but I guess that part of it doesn't really matter. The lack of consistency in the rulings is pretty appalling though.

[Thana8088]

Now come on guys, you weren't there and you don't know what really happened.

Oh wait, yes we do....

[AnOldEnemy]

15 years later, 3 years of kunark later people still take this shit this seriously?

[Ravager]

Any guesses on how this will be ruled next time it happens?

[Eponymous Anonymous]

Fearstalker's got this new thing called a "real life"... y'all should look into it.

[Lanuven]

Originally Posted by Eponymous Anonymous [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Fearstalker's got this new thing called a "real life"... y'all should look into it.

The question was more directed at the way he lead the guild compared to the way its being ran now. He wasn't scared to cut throats when it was time. This is Catherin's second offense to the rules with a slap on the wrist?

Also, your spending your time on the forums posting in RnF...shouldn't you take your own advice? Just saying..kind of a dumbass comment to make considering your spending your time watching forums for drama if you aren't currently playing.

[HeallunRumblebelly]

Even with turrble rulings , I miss p99. Are we just done with rules Nd precedent now? Can we stop trying to explain mechanics and rules and just start with a list of dicks that need to be sucked so things can go our way?

[Duckwalk]

Go outside?!?

*insert joke about P99 raiding community being unable to simutaneously collect government welfare and deny pixel welfare*