Nocturne

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Science is 100% faith-based.

Only in the same way that the fact you exist is 100% faith based.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Everything I wrote was authored by me.

Your entire premise was lifted (maybe not intentionally) from a study that has already been published. It was in the news last year.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Autotune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Perhaps the mother fucker is comfortable with its self and doesn't feel the need to change what it is.

Guess maybe all the older cavemen were just more of god's creations and he just got drunk towards the end while making them.

Who says that there isn't a stopping point with evolution? Perhaps some shit are better at it than others? Who is to say Aliens didn't collect a bunch of shit and just drop it off as their on little scientific experiment?

You faggots can go back and forth with extremes of science, but none of you nor most of the "experts" of the world really know what the fuck they are talking about when it comes to this part of "science" because, well, no one can base it off anything but "faith" and Faith has no business in my fucking Science.

Evolution when compared to Religion is a much more solid foundation in my opinion, at least you can look at something and go... yeah, there are signs that evolution is/has happened with this.

That last paragraph made me laugh. One you are presuming that they are exclusive and second even if evolution is the process by which diversity exist it still would not be a satisfactory enough answer for the origins of life. All it would do is address the mechanics of life but not the why.

How is that primordial soup coming? Amazing we only hear about the Miller-Urey experiment they teach in school as if it had some type of debate ending result.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Nihilist_santa [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That last paragraph made me laugh. One you are presuming that they are exclusive and second even if evolution is the process by which diversity exist it still would not be a satisfactory enough answer for the origins of life. All it would do is address the mechanics of life but not the why.

How is that primordial soup coming? Amazing we only hear about the Miller-Urey experiment they teach in school as if it had some type of debate ending result.

Religion is more inaccurate than it is accurate.

You have something written, by man with the assumption there is a god. No evidence of God exists outside of what you want to say was his "will". You only act on faith that men hundreds of years ago weren't trying to enslave men to their will and get them to act accordingly.

Religion is nothing more than the first viral meme. Someone created one and then everyone had to try their hand at it, making dozens more and some stuck while others faded away. The fact that most religious people automatically reject every other religion solely based on the fact their parents didn't teach it to them is cause enough to see how much bullshit they are.

While there may be a god, he is nothing like what is written in any religious text/story I've ever seen and is definitely not the one portrayed in the holy bible.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Rellapse11 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you faggots should just go watch ancient aliens all your answers is in that show

Ancient aliens [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] What made the "aliens" ? The History channel is only good for learning about the history of terrible jobs ,pickin, and pawning these days. Preparing the next generation to accept the conditions being forged for them now.

[Nihilist_santa]

Well said Harrison.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by Hitchens [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/...s-they-evolve/

Did you even read the blog you posted? It says there are 2 distinct breeding populations and that "someday" "given enough time" "they may evolve into different species". Hardly conclusive evidence.

[Llodd]

Originally Posted by Harrison Remembers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're not some elevated philosopher because you're spewing on the internet, "LOL RELIGION IS DUM ITS JUST TO CONTROL PPL"

Probably not it's initial intention, but hey who knows! It is certain however, that that is how it has been exploited over the centuries. It's like a cult writ large.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Harrison Remembers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Religion is older than "hundreds of years ago"

Your argument is predicated on the errors or downright possible lying of men. The bible could be wrong in 750/1000 places, but if it's right about something you can't ignore it because you don't like it.

You're also attempting to claim that a religion is bullshit because of the behaviors of men, again.(bolded part) You're part of the crowd that automatically rejects any faith-based reasoning under the assumption it makes you look intelligent. You only come off as a close-minded ignorant moron, however.

The sooner you realize there are more opportunities for many religions to have many things right, even while having a lot of it downright wrong, the better.

Religion doesn't automatically become entirely false because of some things some men wrote about it in the dark ages.

Religion is older than hundreds of years ago? I'm pretty sure you can use hundreds up to several thousands. Excuse me for using hundreds to allow for the many different religions that have been created over the span of human history. You know, because you seem to only be thinking of a few.

The second part depends on what they are right about and what they are wrong about. The fact you lump all the information of what they are or could be wrong about is hilarious. If they tell you 1 + 1 is equal to 2, it doesn't lend credibility to the fact that they tell you snakes talk, a woman had a virgin birth and some old guy split a sea in half.

You have no clue, as usual, what part of any crowd any person is from. This is mainly because you are blinded by your ignorance and hatred towards others that you jump on any stubborn opportunity to try and insult them. You fail to see that many religions are corrupted by men and have been proven to be so, you then try to suggest that one can only take it on faith that the rest isn't corrupted. When a part of a whole is proven to be inaccurate, you must criticize the rest of the work and not take it on faith that it is accurate because it says to. If the bible were a man and it's inaccuracies where the evidence against him for committing murder and the accurate information was his salvation, the bible would be convicted of murder. Christianity is not the only religion that would have their text convicted either.

The bolded part is about people being taught they are right and everyone else is incorrect. You can't have a religion without a man behind it pushing it. I can tell you that every religion is incorrect and by every religion's own admittance I would be correct about all of them (save for one possibility that one is correct). You can tell me that all of them can be correct based on the possibility that some of what they say may actually be true, however you would be incorrect about everyone of them (save for one possibility that one is correct). So yes, you being taught that your religion is correct and the others are incorrect is bullshit.

Like I said previously, if there is a God or Gods, it is nothing like what has been written in any of the religious texts I have read or skimmed.

[Autotune]

Originally Posted by Harrison Remembers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That is a lot of words to say almost nothing. Man, you really are just bad at everything. Fortunately, you can't cheat your way through a debate.

Aww, here I was hoping you'd keep elaborating on how a religion can have 75% wrong and still have a passing grade.