I did not get the shots and do not regret it

[Patrece]

ya it'd be a whizbang alright

its mostly taken over already but by corpos who are a whole different story, not the real leftist communist goofballs

THAT is the faction im talking being completely in control some how

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by Patrece [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ya it'd be a whizbang alright

its mostly taken over already but by corpos who are a whole different story, not the real leftist communist goofballs

THAT is the faction im talking being completely in control some how

Ok, I think I got it.



Corporate entities are one of the main "instruments" by which capital gets allocated, invested, distributed wisely. A corporation is going to have to meet certain standards of financial transparency precisely because, the investor class likes to make sure its investment capital is not being squandered. The corporation is the cornerstone of modern capitalism, not the tycoon. Those days are gone with top hats.


So your view is the government is currently mostly in thrall to corporate interests, which means a capitalist economic system in one of its bedrock forms. As you say "this is a whole different story," and I would say so. But where do these "real leftist communist goofballs" come from?


I'm serious, how did they get in this picture, and are you saying they are in cahoots with the capitalists? Just confused. Who's in charge. "Capital interests, ultimately." Ok, cool. "But then the communists can take over too."


?



Look, what's taking over, right? And who's in charge, ok? That is all I am asking.


Let's say we have a big meeting, and all these people you say either want to take over or have taken charge are there.



What do they all agree on?

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Sadre Spinegnawer [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok, I think I got it.



Corporate entities are one of the main "instruments" by which capital gets allocated, invested, distributed wisely. A corporation is going to have to meet certain standards of financial transparency precisely because, the investor class likes to make sure its investment capital is not being squandered. The corporation is the cornerstone of modern capitalism, not the tycoon. Those days are gone with top hats.


So your view is the government is currently mostly in thrall to corporate interests, which means a capitalist economic system in one of its bedrock forms. As you say "this is a whole different story," and I would say so. But where do these "real leftist communist goofballs" come from?


I'm serious, how did they get in this picture, and are you saying they are in cahoots with the capitalists? Just confused. Who's in charge. "Capital interests, ultimately." Ok, cool. "But then the communists can take over too."


?



Look, what's taking over, right? And who's in charge, ok? That is all I am asking.


Let's say we have a big meeting, and all these people you say either want to take over or have taken charge are there.



What do they all agree on?

Extremely problematic devil's advocate answer: social democracy is well within the socialist tradition.

[Chortles Snortles]

can’t wait to trade creative forum posting critical elf race theory for food and shelter
oh boy!
(lol)

[Chortles Snortles]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Chortles Snortles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

For what purpose does the gentleman from Harlem seek recognition?

[Horza]

Corporate communism? These new Republican buzzwords are really just getting too confusing for me.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Corporate communism? These new Republican buzzwords are really just getting too confusing for me.

I think it means DEI/ESG I'm not sure which is which.

[Patrece]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Corporate communism? These new Republican buzzwords are really just getting too confusing for me.

do you need help readin', boy?

[Sadre Spinegnawer]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Corporate communism? These new Republican buzzwords are really just getting too confusing for me.

You've never seen someone pull words from their ass before? It's a treat.



Over on the FoH forums, they are convinced it's all "global homogenization" -- a combo of corporate homoism and social homoism. Which they think is a clever cover for the fact they are all deep in the throes of gay / incel panic.



Elliot Rodgers is not dead. He's running for congress. And is pro-Russia because... Russia also hates teh gay. And promised him he'd get laid.