Are we allowed to like AI art?

[Ekco]

first AI image that's made me laugh in awhile
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Ciderpress]

Everybody poops!

[Ciderpress]

Asking google questions about p99 results in hilariously almost-right answers:

Prompt: p99 what are hill giants?

"In the context of EverQuest's Project 1999 (p99), hill giants are a type of monster, specifically a type of giant, that are commonly found in the Western Plains of Karana, West Commonlands, Northern Plains of Karana, Rathe Mountains, and Eastern Plains of Karana. They are known for being a good source of experience and loot for players in the 30-50 level range. Hill giants are also known to drop raw platinum and are a target for those seeking to farm for loot rights to items like ancient cyclops rings."

"Loot: They drop raw platinum, and some players hunt them for the loot rights to items like ancient cyclops rings."

Like yeah, that's basically right I guess, just phrased incredibly weirdly.

[Ekco]

Starting today, Google is implementing a change that will enable its Gemini AI engine to interact with third-party apps, such as WhatsApp, even when users previously configured their devices to block such interactions. Users who don't want their previous settings to be overridden may have to take action.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

I heard of some country allowing its citizens to copyright their own face so that it can’t be used in AI without their consent

Seems interesting, otherwise this shit gonna get crazy outta control

[shovelquest]

At this point I can envision a future that is like startrek where nobody goes to the movies anymore and nobody plays video games and everyone does science and enjoys the finer things of human history with AI.

Or I can see a trash dystopia where everyone roots for copywrite laws and restrictions and try's to hold back our technologically creative spirit so we can keep slurping up dirt social media advertisments music and other dogshit we call entertainment now days.

[NopeNopeNopeNope]

Originally Posted by shovelquest [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

At this point I can envision a future that is like startrek where nobody goes to the movies anymore and nobody plays video games and everyone does science and enjoys the finer things of human history with AI.

Or I can see a trash dystopia where everyone roots for copywrite laws and restrictions and try's to hold back our technologically creative spirit so we can keep slurping up dirt social media advertisments music and other dogshit we call entertainment now days.

Will the utopia also involve us somehow fixing having the collective attention span of a fruit fly?

Because as it stands now (almost) someone can make an AI video of you doing something just creatively terrible/disturbing enough but still be believable, and use it to ruin your reputation, maybe not amongst your closest family, but with anyone else that knows you

Then when your campaign to prove the original was fake finally concludes, people won’t care about the update, nor will the update get circulated

It already has been proven. Lie in an article, and 80% or so of people will miss the update

[shovelquest]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Will the utopia also involve us somehow fixing having the collective attention span of a fruit fly?

Yes that type will rot in basements until they are extinct and nobody will care and the go getters will be out there have a great time.

[Ciderpress]

Originally Posted by NopeNopeNopeNope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It already has been proven. Lie in an article, and 80% or so of people will miss the update

This is depressingly true, might even be more than 80% of people.

Write slanderous untrue headline and blatant opinion piece disguised as "news", issue correction like three weeks later in fine print. Damage done, and you still get to claim you're a journalist cause you "corrected" the record.

[Reiwa]

Originally Posted by Ciderpress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is depressingly true, might even be more than 80% of people.

Write slanderous untrue headline and blatant opinion piece disguised as "news", issue correction like three weeks later in fine print. Damage done, and you still get to claim you're a journalist cause you "corrected" the record.

Journalists are journaling in their journals, not reporting the news.