Impeaching President Trump

[Teppler]

Trump probably has between a 10-20 point lead on anything the Dems throw at him. They would have to pack in something in the number of 10+ million votes to sway the election. It would take millions of fraudulent votes in battleground states to swing it against him. It's still possible, this is why Trump is a retard for not taking any action even on the smaller elections that were straight up rigged.

Hillary added roughly 4 million votes in 2016, mostly from California. The problem was, she couldn't fake enough votes in Florida due to Broward County (epicenter of voter fraud) not even having enough people living in it. Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania were also the same deal, they simply didn't have the fraud infrastructure readily set up in all of those states and everything blew up in their faces. They usually relied on Florida or Ohio, but then other states came into play and it was over before it even started.

Again, adding MILLIONS of votes is different than adding hundreds of thousands of votes in battle ground states, as they've done in the past. Doug Jones won because dems simply added a hundred thousand fake ballots. That's all it took. But if they want to beat Trump, it's going to require a lot more.

Their only tactic right now is simply spamming the public with fake news against Trump and banning all other information. That's their only end-all be-all solution to this, hence why I post about it. It's going to be worse than 2016. Instead of boomer TV ads and footing the bills on all the cable news networks, most of their money is going into online propaganda straight up. They will employ probably 100x more shill than Shareblue next year. And anyone with a big enough following who exposes it will simply be wiped off the internet.

[Ligma]

If Republicans cared about election security they would vote on the bill that's been sitting in McConnells graveyard

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Ligma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If Republicans cared about election security they would vote on the bill that's been sitting in McConnells graveyard

Establishment republicans are eternal losers to establishment corrupt democrats. Say it with me and politics over the last 30 years will make sense.

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Ligma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If Republicans cared about election security they would vote on the bill that's been sitting in McConnells graveyard

You need to learn to use words like "My opinion is ......"

Republicans opinion on the bill is that it has language that coincides with the first amendment. I haven't read it too much but I'm also not the asshat claiming there aren't two sides to a story.

[Ligma]

So why refuse to even vote? Seems suspicious if your opponents are cheating so badly, no?

[Teppler]

Why do democrats push the idea that voter ID laws are racist? Even cartel ridden mexico has them.

It's the party of voter fraud.

[Ligma]

The real question is why do Republicans think voter suppression benefits them. Since their motivation for it has already been exposed.

[Teppler]

Originally Posted by Ligma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The real question is why do Republicans think voter suppression benefits them. Since their motivation for it has already been exposed.

Asking for an ID is not suppression. Even ghetto ass cartel ridden mexico has that protection so people can't exploit their elections. The fact that we don't points to the idea that we WANT the opposite. At least the liberal establishment in power wants it. They want people exploiting the election through confusion related to ID. If not, give me another reason why we don't have this simple protection that even countries like Mexico has.

[BallzDeep]

Originally Posted by Ligma [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The real question is why do Republicans think voter suppression benefits them. Since their motivation for it has already been exposed.

It's common sense. If I tell you that I am for giving away free shit and the other guy tells you that you need to earn it, if we have an election and you eventually become a legal citizen, who will you vote for?

What if I told you that giving free shit, in my opinion, is bad and that earning things actually teaches people valuable life lessons that important to growth and society?

You are also advocating for a group of people that might be new to the US and barely understand the English language, let alone politics and asking them to vote on the philosophy of life in the US. Doesn't that sound a little stupid? Wouldn't you want the people who really care about politics atleast need to put in an effort to understand them and vote?

[Teppler]

It's interesting that democrats and liberals constantly take these positions where americans and our institutions aren't protected.