![]() |
|
#2011
|
||||
|
Quote:
Why don't you relate more things to the deepstate and frogs like Alex Jones. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
|
||||
|
#2012
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2013
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2014
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2015
|
|||
|
This channel has maybe a slight conservative slant, but he almost always interviews people in positions of authority and experience (city officials, attorneys, police chiefs, etc)
I don’t live in CA, but I found it interesting, at times a bit dry: Haven’t watched this particular one, but I’ve watched about 5 different vids on this channel all the way through while doing housework https://m.youtube.com/watch?v= | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2016
|
|||
|
^
The one big important thing when it comes to crime statistics is when people feel like police are not solving these crimes like break ins and theft, they become disenfranchised and give up reporting them, because nothing happened when they did before So anywhere that is going on won’t actually have accurate crime statistics. They’re always going to be lower than what is actually occurring. So we can’t even rely on the raw data | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2017
|
|||
|
These Libs with heads in the sand. Pull some fringe case and build a case around it, while also ignoring the mountain of evidence in front of their face. The transformation of the Left into what it is today is shocking.
??-2020 Liberal: Big Pharma is the most corrupt industry on the planet! 2020-?? Liberal: Big Pharma will save us, shut up and take the Vaccine or you'll kill grandma! You can replace Big Pharm with numerous terms. Completely lacking any moral compass. Haidt has a book that goes in depth about this and his finding is that by in large Liberals care about two of the five moral pillars, but they care DEEPLY about them, at the expense of the other morals. Whereas conservatives hold a balanced position on all of the pillars. Good read. The Righteous Mind | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2018
|
|||
|
The reporter John Stossel's is known to make things up.
The John Stossel who created a lawsuit getting his “marketplace of ideas” panties all in a bunch because Facebook placed a fact check on a nonsense video he did about climate change, and Stossel was suddenly no longer so interested in the marketplace of ideas. He had to bring in the state to punish those who dared to say things he didn’t like. The video in question was about forest fires in California, and spoke to someone who argued that climate change is “not the primary cause” of the rash of forest fires in California in 2020. There was then another video that also got a fact check, this one with clips of a debate he moderated about climate change. In the video Stossel talks about “environmental alarmists” and plays down their concerns. Again, this video got a similar fact check regarding some misleading claims. Stossel took all of this personally, and insisted that this fact check defamed him (he claims that he wasn’t suing about the “missing context” label, just the underlying fact check). But, John, that’s not how the marketplace of ideas works. And the court has now made that clear. First, the court notes that for the “fire” video, while Stossel claims that the video defamed him, the fact check was about the entire video not just the claims made by Stossel, and the fact check by the court was found to be accurate regarding other claims made by people in the video. Yeah John Stossel's is an embarrassment from his other videos like Woke Medicine and more. So yeah Ripp is doing his alternative fact finding using a known lair. By the way Ripp I picked a website to explain this THAT isn't on one of your long laundry lists of Sites you consider Liberal Fake news (but you may want to add it) https://www.techdirt.com/2022/10/14/...fact-checkers/ | ||
|
Last edited by Botten; 07-20-2023 at 01:50 PM..
|
|
||
|
#2019
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
Last edited by Botten; 07-20-2023 at 01:55 PM..
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|