******Official politics thread ******

[JurisDictum]

Guys, It's ok if the government knows you like furry manga....

But you want your damn boss knowing what kind of shit you look up? Reading your posts? Keeping tabs on you?

I feel a little bit better about government big brother than the corporate version.

[Irulan]

Maybe.

[Mblake1981]

Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Guys, It's ok if the government knows you like furry manga....

But you want your damn boss knowing what kind of shit you look up? Reading your posts? Keeping tabs on you?

I feel a little bit better about government big brother than the corporate version.

Message boards are the extent of social media that I personally get involved with. Agree with your point, the Gov is more removed than your boss or peers are. One person/group you interact with on a daily basis and the other you will probably never meet face to face.

If Gov work is in your plans though, someone is gonna know about your Furry Manga hehe.

[Irulan]

Originally Posted by Mblake1981 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Message boards are the extent of social media that I personally get involved with. Agree with your point, the Gov is more removed than your boss or peers are. One person/group you interact with on a daily basis and the other you will probably never meet face to face.

If Gov work is in your plans though, someone is gonna know about your Furry Manga hehe.

One day furryism will be a prerequisite and perk of government payrollees.

JK though, maybe not. Hard to tell.

[America]

Originally Posted by Irulan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

One day furryism will be a prerequisite and perk of government payrollees.

JK though, maybe not. Hard to tell.

cia leaks demonstrated that yes it already is so. could have been russki disinfo to try and sell us on brony operatives th0. i dunno [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Throndor]

No response to the fact that the ideology of "that's just a social construct" was founded by, and used by the same group of social scientists to rationalize and lobby for the decriminalization of consensual sex with children? I trust we won't hear that argument again, or is the converse argument that Hitler "had some pretty good ideas, aside from the whole genocide-y part" a valid belief system too?

[mickmoranis]

real news accidentally on CNN wont change your minds though that its all flower children trying to find amnesty.

Sure didnt stop this idiot on CNN from thinking that.

"theyre economic migrants, not seeking asylum, they passed multiple assylum stations to get to the border"

"but weve been told that they were upset because of how long the application process took, would it have solved this problem if that was quicker?"

its like, he just said that they are not eligable for amnesty NOR are they applying lol wtf is wrong with you libtards jeesus christ.

i thought you guys were WOKE

[Irulan]

Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No response to the fact that the ideology of "that's just a social construct" was founded by, and used by the same group of social scientists to rationalize and lobby for the decriminalization of consensual sex with children? I trust we won't hear that argument again, or is the converse argument that Hitler "had some pretty good ideas, aside from the whole genocide-y part" a valid belief system too?

Im not interested in debating the ideas of social constructs. They, if they exist, aren't relevant to who I am now.

I hold doors for people because I like being nice. Not because it's expected of me.

I pity those who live lives based on the expectations of others.

[Irulan]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

real news accidentally on CNN wont change your minds though that its all flower children trying to find amnesty.

Sure didnt stop this idiot on CNN from thinking that.

"theyre economic migrants, not seeking asylum, they passed multiple assylum stations to get to the border"

"but weve been told that they were upset because of how long the application process took, would it have solved this problem if that was quicker?"

its like, he just said that they are not eligable for amnesty NOR are they applying lol wtf is wrong with you libtards jeesus christ.

i thought you guys were WOKE

I never thought that.

[ScaringChildren]

Originally Posted by mickmoranis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

real news accidentally on CNN wont change your minds though that its all flower children trying to find amnesty.

Sure didnt stop this idiot on CNN from thinking that.

"theyre economic migrants, not seeking asylum, they passed multiple assylum stations to get to the border"

"but weve been told that they were upset because of how long the application process took, would it have solved this problem if that was quicker?"

its like, he just said that they are not eligable for amnesty NOR are they applying lol wtf is wrong with you libtards jeesus christ.

i thought you guys were WOKE

CNN is using a propaganda technique here called "Thought-terminating cliché".

Using a useless truism (that the immigration process should be streamlined, gaining favor with most people) and pretending it's an effective rebuttal or shutdown to the original statement.