POLL Does azreal need new leadership?

[Elderan]

Originally Posted by KabanazyTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The fight, if you had an ld was 35 v 25. Stop acting so butthurt about it and trying to skew the numbers even further.

It was a good fight, you guys had the advantage of not only gear, but zone control when we zoned in. You had all of your casters and healers on top of the portal using grav flux im assuming.

You admit you had 35 azrael and 10 more force came as well.

I know you like to skew the numbers to prevent the thought they you were the zerg but it just wasn't the case. We were zerged. It happens and was a fun fight. We were winning the first 10 min of the fight but for every person we lost you had more. In the end we just lost due to attrition.

You had 45, we had 25. If you had come in with only 35 you would have lost plain and simple and you know it.

We also had mobs on us when you came in. We were very light on melee that night and only had 8 melee vs your 26.

You also had 40 at Trak and we had 22.

In hindsight we had a bad pvp group combination that night and should have not fought 45 vs 25. But we generally don't run.

I just like to make sure people know the real facts is all.

[KabanazyTZ]

Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You admit you had 35 azrael and 10 more force came as well.

I know you like to skew the numbers to prevent the thought they you were the zerg but it just wasn't the case. We were zerged. It happens and was a fun fight. We were winning the first 10 min of the fight but for every person we lost you had more. In the end we just lost due to attrition.

You had 45, we had 25. If you had come in with only 35 you would have lost plain and simple and you know it.

We also had mobs on us when you came in. We were very light on melee that night and only had 8 melee vs your 26.

You also had 40 at Trak and we had 22.

In hindsight we had a bad pvp group combination that night and should have not fought 45 vs 25. But we generally don't run.

I just like to make sure people know the real facts is all.

No we had 35 Azrael + Force, not 35 Azrael and 10 force during the pvp. I don't understand how you guys are still having issues understanding this

[Faerie Blossom]

Grats on CT guys [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Awwalike]

some novels in this bitch lol

[Smedy]

25 with best gear available in kunark should always beat 35 52-58 (2 diff guild) unorganized shit geared force if skill was the factor, clearly skill isn't the factor for nihilum

you got numbers, you got gear, you miss something bro shit's classic

[Elderan]

Originally Posted by Smedy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

25 with best gear available in kunark should always beat 35 52-58 (2 diff guild) unorganized shit geared force if skill was the factor, clearly skill isn't the factor for nihilum

you got numbers, you got gear, you miss something bro shit's classic

We would have beat 35

We lost to 45 though. Happens.

[Jenni D]

Cant really argue with smedy there.

[Elderan]

Originally Posted by Jenni D [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Cant really argue with smedy there.

Sure I can. He claims we lost to 35... we lost to 45

Not sure how hard that is to understand.

[Num1RecommendedByDentists]

Originally Posted by Elderan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sure I can. He claims we lost to 35... we lost to 45

Not sure how hard that is to understand.

we never at any point last night had 45 people

just because you log in a level one alt and /who feerrot and there are 47 people in zone, does not mean they were a part of our raid

[Sweetbaby Jesus]

Originally Posted by Num1RecommendedByDentists [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

we never at any point last night had 45 people

just because you log in a level one alt and /who feerrot and there are 47 people in zone, does not mean they were a part of our raid

He's right it was 41 not 45. geez