![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
|
||||
|
Quote:
Highkeep I am kos, and it's an outdoor zone but I havent noticed agro from nobles unless you're los, this could be due to them having small agro radius though PoHate you have probably 5-10 mobs agro upon port in no matter what, every time. Moving around in that zone is pretty treachorous. if you mean do they run through the wall? - depends on zone pathing, often times yes, some zones no. with indoor zones I've found bosses will run into a wall and stick for a few seconds then warp right on top of you outdoor usually is open enough where they dont get stuck if there's an obstruction they usually are able to magically climb over the top of it. | |||
|
#12
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
60 Ranger and proud of it.
First Ranger Epic on P99 3rd place BotB | |||||
|
#13
|
|||||
|
May 14, 2003
Quote:
Quote:
Here it lists Nexona as a Necromancer: http://www.eqclerics.org/forums/showthread.php?t=10799 Silverwing -- Enchanter Hoshkar -- Shaman Xygoz -- Bard Nexona -- Necromancer Phara Dar -- Enchanter Druushk -- Druid | ||||
|
Last edited by Treats; 07-05-2012 at 06:44 PM..
| |||||
|
#14
|
|||
|
AK VP is original, you cannot gate out, have zone out pads at nex and PD, otherwise corpsing out is only way. respawns are super fast as well on trash like 2 min or less.
I'll resign Nexona/Druusk/Xygoz gating for now.. Hosh/SW/PD definitely gate | ||
|
#15
|
||||
|
Quote:
I do remember drakes losing interest and seeming to be tethered to their spawn locations in VP on AK. Mobs used to also lose interest in PCs in Kunark and original EQ but on p99 mobs will chase you down from one side of the zone to the other no matter how much distance you put between you. I don't think they will fix that. Asher | |||
|
#16
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
60 Ranger and proud of it.
First Ranger Epic on P99 3rd place BotB | |||
|
Last edited by Xanthias; 07-05-2012 at 10:31 PM..
| ||||
|
#17
|
|||
|
http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/s...tml?spell=5158
This isnt harmtouch, its dragon harmtouch..apparently it is different. Nex might not be a SK but it is def still a dragon. | ||
|
#18
|
||||
|
Quote:
All thats there is: Dragon Charm Dragon Roar Dragon Roar | |||
|
#19
|
||||
|
Quote:
http://lucy.allakhazam.com/spell.htm...58&source=Test | |||
|
#20
|
|||
|
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If you take a look at its patch history, Dragon Harm touch actually wasn't added until '04, but it also says the name was changed from Harm Touch to Dragon Harm Touch in a little over 24hrs. We all know HT existed well before 2004 and 2002. Is it safe to say Nexona did HT prior to 2002/2004 but the spell name was only changed to reflect a differentiation to DHT in 2004? I'm a little torn on this, for a seemingly well documented game, EQ is so not well documented lol. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] These are comments from 2000 talking about the fact that Nexona does HT. there is some speculation as to how much the Ht should hit for though the general consensus is because Nexona is lvl 65, her HT should hit for 651 similar to a PC HT. | ||
![]() |
|
|