Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-23-2012, 12:24 PM
Destan Destan is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 93
Default

I came to p99 from Fippy on live, and I can safely say nothing is a better duo with a Shaman than a monk. My buddy and I were stupidly dominant, offering the best of everything. Buffs, debuffs, heals, pet, amazing dps, and amazing pulling. The SK is a good option as well, but it breaks down to:

SK does less damage, his FD is not as reliable as a monks, and adds a pretty heavy xp penalty to your setup.

The monk tends to be safer, kill faster (faster killing speeds means more xp per hour, less healing required) and until the post-Velious Monk nerf can tank as well if not better in circumstances than a SK.

Monk if you are a min/maxing all-about-efficiency type, SK if it's not a big deal and your buddy prefers that class. You definetly want a melee over a caster, make that haste buff work for you!
  #12  
Old 04-23-2012, 12:31 PM
Wotsirb401 Wotsirb401 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,015
Default

I currently duo Crypt and other high end camps with a shaman. All we do is slow, pet tanks and torpor/dot. Some kills can take a while if they are healers since we have minimal ways to stop it . The upside is we never run out of mana so downtime is based on the player needing to go to the bathroom etc.
__________________
60 Warrior Hitzme
60 Necro Avicii
21 Shaman Stonecold
52 Monk Happytime
  #13  
Old 04-24-2012, 04:12 AM
Wudan Wudan is offline
Sarnak

Wudan's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Destan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I came to p99 from Fippy on live, and I can safely say nothing is a better duo with a Shaman than a monk. My buddy and I were stupidly dominant, offering the best of everything. Buffs, debuffs, heals, pet, amazing dps, and amazing pulling. The SK is a good option as well, but it breaks down to:

SK does less damage, his FD is not as reliable as a monks, and adds a pretty heavy xp penalty to your setup.

The monk tends to be safer, kill faster (faster killing speeds means more xp per hour, less healing required) and until the post-Velious Monk nerf can tank as well if not better in circumstances than a SK.

Monk if you are a min/maxing all-about-efficiency type, SK if it's not a big deal and your buddy prefers that class. You definetly want a melee over a caster, make that haste buff work for you!
monk will never have the tanking ability of SK. While its all good when fighting regular mobs, it is a different story when pulling high lvl named. SK is better for end game duo with shammy.

tanking ability > dps
  #14  
Old 04-24-2012, 06:05 AM
somnia somnia is offline
Kobold

somnia's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Clouds
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wudan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
monk will never have the tanking ability of SK. While its all good when fighting regular mobs, it is a different story when pulling high lvl named. SK is better for end game duo with shammy.

tanking ability > dps
If it can be slowed then it can probably be killed solo by the shaman. A monk just helps you get there faster.

If it can't be slowed than an SK won't do much good with a shaman healer.
  #15  
Old 04-24-2012, 08:00 AM
Wudan Wudan is offline
Sarnak

Wudan's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by somnia [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
If it can be slowed then it can probably be killed solo by the shaman. A monk just helps you get there faster.

If it can't be slowed than an SK won't do much good with a shaman healer.
This is simply not true. Slow is nice and helps a lot, but its not everything, especialy when engaging named mobs. Thinking shaman can solo stuff he can slow is just silly. In most cases, shamans cant take damage from high end named dungeon mobs. Also, shaman is not cleric... HoT is cool, but on long named fights shaman will be in pain healing monk.

These guys want to take on named mobs in dungeons, SK is the best option, end of story. More hp, better aggro management, much better tanking abilities.

It does not matter his dmg is lower then monks, what matters is whether he can TANK the mob long enough to kill it. He can certainly do that better then monk.
  #16  
Old 04-24-2012, 08:03 AM
Speedling Speedling is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wudan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
This is simply not true. Slow is nice and helps a lot, but its not everything, especialy when engaging named mobs. Thinking shaman can solo stuff he can slow is just silly. In most cases, shamans cant take damage from high end named dungeon mobs. Also, shaman is not cleric... HoT is cool, but on long named fights shaman will be in pain healing monk.

These guys want to take on named mobs in dungeons, SK is the best option, end of story. More hp, better aggro management, much better tanking abilities.

It does not matter his dmg is lower then monks, what matters is whether he can TANK the mob long enough to kill it. He can certainly do that better then monk.
List a name that a sk can tank and a shm can't imo. Shm > sks np.
  #17  
Old 04-24-2012, 08:20 AM
falkun falkun is offline
Planar Protector

falkun's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ruins of Old Sebilis
Posts: 2,464
Default

There is also data parses out there suggesting monk avoidance is on par or better than tank mitigation for damage taken.
  #18  
Old 04-24-2012, 08:24 AM
somnia somnia is offline
Kobold

somnia's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: The Clouds
Posts: 165
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by falkun [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There is also data parses out there suggesting monk avoidance is on par or better than tank mitigation for damage taken.
This + I doubt a shaman and SK will be able to duo many mobs that the shaman couldn't solo.
  #19  
Old 04-24-2012, 08:38 AM
webrunner5 webrunner5 is offline
Planar Protector

webrunner5's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oxford, Ohio
Posts: 4,095
Default

A Ogre Shaman that can slow the mob is a hell of a tank and can kill solo pretty much everything high end but raid mobs, even if it summons. No SK is going to do that solo. Slow is one of the best spells in this game for toe to toe killing.
  #20  
Old 04-24-2012, 09:36 AM
Wudan Wudan is offline
Sarnak

Wudan's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedling [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
List a name that a sk can tank and a shm can't imo. Shm > sks np.
reading comprehension ftw
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.