Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-05-2011, 12:59 PM
SearyxTZ SearyxTZ is offline
Planar Protector

SearyxTZ's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,408
Default

This would be cool and has no major implications since it's optional (and I doubt many people would be xXxh4rdc0r3xXx enough to do it anyway - 5%, maybe)



If it's a severe time-consuming pain in the ass to code though, I'd backburner it
  #12  
Old 11-05-2011, 01:27 PM
Naez 4.20 Naez 4.20 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: s0cal
Posts: 99
Send a message via ICQ to Naez 4.20 Send a message via AIM to Naez 4.20 Send a message via MSN to Naez 4.20 Send a message via Yahoo to Naez 4.20
Default

would basically just take adding db column in the client table "item_loot_flag(BOOLEAN)", add a couple lines to PoD perl quest to set it, and a 4 line switch statement in client::death() to generate proper corpse. You could even generate the item lootable corpse only after checking if both parties are flagged.


I say code it then just enable it by default with no way to turn off imo
  #13  
Old 11-05-2011, 01:36 PM
oldfish oldfish is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PVPBetaChamps [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
god damn stop with the item loot shit, isnt this your 2nd thread on it in less than a week?

stfu.
This isnt my 2nd thread about it, it is your 2nd time you are flaming me for no good reason outside of rant and flames though. Please take your flaming there.

I hope this idea gets taken upon if its easy to code, it would make everyone happy since its optional.
  #14  
Old 11-05-2011, 02:26 PM
Softcore PK Softcore PK is offline
Planar Protector

Softcore PK's Avatar

Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Red99
Posts: 1,236
Default

Not a terrible idea I suppose. I would not be flagging myself for item loot, though.
__________________
“Smile, breathe, and go slowly.”
  #15  
Old 11-05-2011, 04:41 PM
stonetz stonetz is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 82
Default

Love the idea, I can see it being somewhat exploited some how. I'd say a shitty and cheap way to take advantage would be to have a gank squad with say 2 or 3 non item loot chars and a naked wiz with item loot enabled. They beat on an item loot enabled person running around, the naked or almost naked wiz takes the kill shot and grabs the loot.

No risk to the gank squad at all and easy kills for easy loot. People say "this sucks balls, I want to go back to normal" they can't and they quit.


If there's a way to make it work without people abusing it then I'd be all for it but I don't see it.
__________________
Stonetz
Gnome Wizard Red99

Stone <Pandemonium>
Retired Druid from Tallon Zek
  #16  
Old 11-05-2011, 04:47 PM
Naez 4.20 Naez 4.20 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: s0cal
Posts: 99
Send a message via ICQ to Naez 4.20 Send a message via AIM to Naez 4.20 Send a message via MSN to Naez 4.20 Send a message via Yahoo to Naez 4.20
Default

Yea it's gotta be an all or nothing type of thing
  #17  
Old 11-05-2011, 04:53 PM
Korisek Korisek is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 119
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Love the idea, I can see it being somewhat exploited some how. I'd say a shitty and cheap way to take advantage would be to have a gank squad with say 2 or 3 non item loot chars and a naked wiz with item loot enabled. They beat on an item loot enabled person running around, the naked or almost naked wiz takes the kill shot and grabs the loot.

No risk to the gank squad at all and easy kills for easy loot. People say "this sucks balls, I want to go back to normal" they can't and they quit.


If there's a way to make it work without people abusing it then I'd be all for it but I don't see it.
There's a priest of order NPC walking around Qeynos on the blue server that can reverse PvP status.

Perhaps something similar can be put in?
__________________
Irving, Human Paladin of Karana
Korisek, Iksar Warrior of Cazic-Thule
And 5 others.

I don't like empty character slots that much.
  #18  
Old 11-05-2011, 05:02 PM
stonetz stonetz is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 82
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Korisek [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There's a priest of order NPC walking around Qeynos on the blue server that can reverse PvP status.

Perhaps something similar can be put in?

Problem is people would only go itemloot when they wanted to go gank people snag some shit and then switch back. If it's not all or nothing it will take the fun out of it / get abused etc.

Another option might be an area / zone whatever that was item loot enabled. I don't know how hard that would be to code, doesn't seem that bad to me but I'm not balls deep in the code.

hell maybe even a /itemduel but I'm more concerned with essential mechanics than item loot. It can wait.
__________________
Stonetz
Gnome Wizard Red99

Stone <Pandemonium>
Retired Druid from Tallon Zek
  #19  
Old 11-05-2011, 06:49 PM
oldfish oldfish is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 417
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by stonetz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Love the idea, I can see it being somewhat exploited some how. I'd say a shitty and cheap way to take advantage would be to have a gank squad with say 2 or 3 non item loot chars and a naked wiz with item loot enabled. They beat on an item loot enabled person running around, the naked or almost naked wiz takes the kill shot and grabs the loot.

No risk to the gank squad at all and easy kills for easy loot. People say "this sucks balls, I want to go back to normal" they can't and they quit.


If there's a way to make it work without people abusing it then I'd be all for it but I don't see it.
Then they could code it like a PVE kill. He has to do the most dmg for item loot to kick in. Still a naked wiz could still do most of the dmg... but at least youd know who to go for first lol

Thanks for pointing out a flaw scenario though, i wouldnt want this in if it can be easily exploited
  #20  
Old 11-05-2011, 07:42 PM
boss boss is offline
Aviak


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 69
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nuk3Afr1ca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That would be l33t. I would do it if the server used EQ live resists. Too bad i only like the cock in my mouth regime.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:18 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.