|  | 
| 
 | |||||||
|  | 
|  | Thread Tools | Display Modes | 
| 
			 
			#11  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 
				__________________ | |||
|  | ||||
| 
			 
			#12  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   This server is going all the way to velious.  Do you expect them to change core game dynamics like line of sight for every expansion?  It should be set to whatever the most reasonable one is from the get-go (which isn't 0 LOS). | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#13  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   Actually, they are going to change things(when possible and feasible) to reflect when it was taken away, added, etc. in its timeline. Glaring exploits, bugs, imbalances etc. are excluded. This is why it's important to nail things down accurately and not listen to retards saying shit like, "pacify never aggros" without proof. (he later edited his post when he was wrong, AGAIN) Line of sight requirements have changed at LEAST once since release up to later expansions. Figuring out when is the important part. | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#14  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   You had griefers  go up five flights of stairs in HHK and nuke the group down in the basement goblins.  Or Kirban the wiz do the same thing, nukeing groups on the very top ramps in Velks Lab from the zone in.   It was retarded, but thats what it was. This changed in Luclin. They added a LoS check either to the beginning of the casting or the end of the casting. I want to say ending, because I remember dancing around corners in Velks Lab to break LoS on Kirban's nukes. | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#15  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 In the patch notes (I went over them all extensively), there is never even a mention of having 0 LoS checks even though it was in game like that for a while. I'm pretty sure having 0 LoS was entirely a mistake for PvP in the first place. | |||
|  | ||||
| 
			 
			#16  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 
				__________________ | |||
|  | ||||
| 
			 
			#17  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   I don't mind if they did LoS at the beginning of the cast.  Should never be 2 LoS checks with all the ways you can lose LoS with hills etc. 
				__________________ | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#18  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | |||
| 
 |   Yeah LoS is gay at the end.  Most "fair" would be LoS at beginning, range check w/ bonus at end. So if you have LoS and can start the cast, if it finishes and they are within range + a little space for fuck ups it lands (to be checked against resists). Two checks would be retarded and unfair. 
				__________________ ~not hiding behind my forum account~ blue: zarina / gumby / park / lulls / kiss / pamela / barbarous / dolemite / patsy / tick / cupid / jilena / magine red: trolling / lust | ||
|  | |||
| 
			 
			#19  
			
			
			
			
			
		 | ||||
| 
 |   Quote: 
 It was way broken mechanic and wouldn't mind if it was not in the game. I know I griefed a few people off RZ like this. When they would rage at me super hard afterwards. Was worth some LoLs but did not help the community. EQ at the time did not need help though. It was boomin. Nobles and bard room always camped. Multiple goblin groups. People killin prisoners. People killing guards. Ahhh, the days. | |||
| 
				
					
						Last edited by Crenshinabon; 10-13-2011 at 09:02 PM..
					
					
				
			 |  | |||
|  | 
| 
 | 
 |