![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
Koota was using it to track and you caught him red handed and punished the entire guild. Perun was using it to track as well, though tracking the entire zone to see a mob that was already up and note where the other guild was. you know exactly how both guilds benefited yet only acted on one. banning every guild that had cheaters? ban the entire server then, but you've never done that. you guys specifically banned guilds that you know and can prove that benefited from cheats. if you're telling me that you'd ban div from raiding and have anywhere near that solid proof i'd fucking love to hear it, or any other guild on the server for that matter. you've got to see the double standard here. throw in that he's coming back in a week along with the rest of them AND they get to keep most if not all of their goodies? | |||
|
Last edited by Skope; 09-03-2011 at 10:03 PM..
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
What does this thread have to do with favoritism/Xzerion?
What benefit does using a 3rd party program as an officer as opposed to a member have on the outcome of a raid? If anything, a puller using those programs would have the biggest affect on the outcome of a raid I think! | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Otherwise STFU | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Raid suspend Sworen. Problem solved.
Thanks, Fraggle | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
If any guilds get raid suspensions, it would be all of them. If that's what you want I will consider it. I asked the raid guilds to start working with eachother and getting along and you still cannot go one week without multiple raid disputes and rule lawyering.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
You know it's fair that since an OFFICER of TR was caught cheating, that by those actions the guild should share equal punishment. TMO is not DA. TMO's officer are completely innocent of using hacks during a competitive raid. This is the important distinction you are ignoring. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|