Progression Server

[Duik]

I'm not in the know at all but I would not think a progession server of any sort os incomming on p99 cuz that is Daybreaks bread and butter.

It can not be put more simply than that.

That however is just IMHO.

Just think people.

[Eisai]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not in the know at all but I would not think a progession server of any sort os incomming on p99 cuz that is Daybreaks bread and butter.

It can not be put more simply than that.

That however is just IMHO.

Just think people.

Heard daybreak was bought out, did they keep the name?

[Old_PVP]

Originally Posted by Algustus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just curious what the issues are. I'm sure there must be something that keeps us from doing a day one server again.

The issues are the devs are busy playing other games and have checked out.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Old_PVP [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The issues are the devs are busy playing other games and have checked out.

Except the recent even and patch changes make clear that they're not checked out.

Nilbog also responded in a thread that certain changes (like the BGs in HK no longer being there after November 1999) should be expected in future iterations of the server.

[WarpathEQ]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Except the recent even and patch changes make clear that they're not checked out.

Nilbog also responded in a thread that certain changes (like the BGs in HK no longer being there after November 1999) should be expected in future iterations of the server.

Yeah I balance the amount of patch changes that focused on patching content prior to the current timeline (would only impact a new server/progression) with the realization that it was like 3 years between patches and many of those things were probably fixed in parallel with green launch and in timeline issues when they were addressed but were just never pushed into production with a patch.

Part of me feels optimistic that the patch is a precursor to a new server/reset. Part of me feels like it was just addressing things in real time, those things became unimportant due to progression and therefore it wasn't urgent to release patches along the way.

[cd288]

It's probably a mix of both. Nilbog and Rogean push those updates out when they have the time in their own lives and feel like doing it. I wouldn't say that it means a new server is right around the corner, but I do think Nilbog's response means that they have a plan for a new server eventually. Whether that's in the next few months or like a year from now remains to be seen.

[Algustus]

Well, if any future change involved allowing binds at the Fire Pots all my personal desire for a progression server would be met.

[Eisai]

Originally Posted by Algustus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, if any future change involved allowing binds at the Fire Pots all my personal desire for a progression server would be met.

And then I could snipe some of those DAP druids!

[sajbert]

Originally Posted by Algustus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well, if any future change involved allowing binds at the Fire Pots all my personal desire for a progression server would be met.

More or less this. I don't feel a strong desire for a new server, it's shit fighting over crap camps like Cynthia. Just want the legacy items + firepot binds. I guess I'd enjoy grouping in places like Guk.

What class would u firepot bind?

[shovelquest]

Us:



Nil/rog: