![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Or, to be more precise, to my knowledge no one has presented any evidence that they could (not even if you go further, into the Luclin era), and I haven't found any myself ... presumably because no one could during the classic era. And again, we don't need to look to laggy internet connections to explain it: plain old mechanical differences (eg. channeling mechanics) offer all the explanation we need.
__________________
Loramin Frostseer <Anonymous>, Hetch<Anonymous>, Tecla <Kingdom>, ... Check out the "Where To Go For XP/For Treasure?" Guides Anyone can improve the wiki! If you are new to the Blue or Green servers, you can improve the wiki to earn a "welcome package" of platinum and/or gear! Send me a forum message for details. | |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
There was a huge controversy on p1999 on whether AC worked at all. The overall system got tweaked but I don’t think individual mobs got rebalanced. | |||
|
Last edited by Jimjam; 11-15-2022 at 12:53 PM..
| ||||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#5
|
|||
|
The only thing wrong with enchanters is channeling, which affects literally any class that casts spells. So by that argument every single class able to cast a spell is unclassic on P99.
| ||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
You are right that every caster is unclassic. P99 is currently in mega unclassic mode and there isn't really any excuse for ignoring a core mechanic being broken like this when I even provided the code to fix it and the evidence is a LEAD developer on SONY forums explaining exactly how channeling worked. Enchanter has the lowest HP of any class and charming mobs, especially indoors, results in being hit a lot. This should result in a lot of danger but due to Enchanters also having CC spells and being able to channel through this combat eliminates that risk. Yes, it impacts everything though. Your group cleric gets a mob on them and roots it and moves back. Not so fast. That shouldn't be so easy. Your group SK tank who is already in combat casts Disease Cloud on that mob on your group healer. Not so fast. That shouldn't be so easy. One of the biggest problems is that Enchanter on P99 at level 60 in Velious is pretty close to live Enchanter. Could a level 60 nicely geared Velious Enchanter solo Hate on live? Probably. The issue is that they should have had a MISERABLE time getting to level 60. Enchanters were always the first and most often dead in groups. It was a fucking terrible class to get to high levels. Second this ignores that Enchanter in classic and Kunark era is nothing like live. Apparently since at the end of a server when it's close to dead Enchanter works similar to live we should ignore all that time in between and how those Enchanters ended up where they are at level 60 with max raid gear. This gets back to the "end game life is all the matters" mindset of the majority of P99 players and devs apparently. In live classic era charm was so broken it was almost guaranteed to get you or your group killed. The mobs fell through the floor, they ran all over the place uncontrolled, warped, attacked your own team who couldn't attack back, there is probably 100 bugs with charm that existed in live classic era and evidence was gathered in bug report threads on this. On P99 charm is totally reliable and understood during classic and is used to power level groups of players up to 50 with backstabbing trivially controlled pets. By the time Kunark launches the server is already FUCKED. Everyone has multiple max level alts, the gear is farmed all to shit, there is 10,000 characters at level 50 waiting for Kunark to open. None of this is remotely close to classic and it directly effects the server over Kunark and Velious era. But I guess none of that matters as long as Enchanter is "kind of the same" at level 60 in Velious with fully equipped raid gear. Could you give pets fine steel daggers to increase attack speed on live classic era? Yes, you could. Oh too bad it's nerfed on P99 for "balance" reasons. Could you charm mobs reliably and use them to solo in dungeons? Never. Nothing remotely close to this happened in live during that era. Enchanter was a buggy garbage class just like most other pet classes who would not get invited to groups and if they did people told them to not summon a pet because it would take off running to the other side of the zone for no reason. You're in luck though! P99 loves this non classic mechanic! In fact I even found a thread on Afterlife forums discussing charm where it clearly discusses how charm wasn't viable except for outdoor zones where the Enchanter also had SoW UNTIL Velious and BECAUSE it has so many larger dungeons where Enchanters had room to do CC and run around. The silence from the devs about Enchanters and channeling is deafening. This is the meta they want. While Enchanter at level 60 in raid gear end of Velious era may be close to live most of you scrubs would have NEVER made it that far without these broken mechanics. In fact, if just channeling was fixed, I bet 90% of "raiders" on P99 wouldn't even be able to make it to max level by this point on green. | |||
|
Last edited by azxten; 11-10-2022 at 03:16 PM..
| ||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
Where is my server? It's up right now. What's broken on my server? I implemented instanced dueling in about 2 hours and it works just fine. No one plays on it? It's a private in development server, I sure hope no one is playing on it or I fucked up. I think you're confusing my server with P99. Channeling works on my server and is classic, P99 is the one with broken channeling and 1,000 "raid" players stacked at max level with 10 alts waiting to login and zerg raid mobs that are also broken not classic experience. Feel free to review the mob push thread in bug reports too. Super classic experience there. Stand back everyone, let the Enchanter pets clear the zone. Also I think it's funny you came to my thread asking about starting a server and were like, "OMG neato! Do this! Do that" and then elsewhere you're like, "lol look at this guy! he wants to make a server!" It's a bit schizophrenic. | |||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
![]() |
|
|