The People vs. Nirgon. Charges: Illiteracy, Obstruction of Justice, Cowardice.

[Sethius Marlowe]

To be clear. The people specifically are referring to the car crash victim mongoloid referred to as solleks.

Evidence of mental deficiency: who the fuck got banned? What are you talking about you nimwit? Why are you talking to adults? Is there medication that you need to be taking or maybe have taken too much of?

[solleks]

U did. Maybe stop jerkin off

[Sethius Marlowe]

Originally Posted by solleks [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

U did. Maybe stop jerkin off

Are you honestly a retarded person? I'm asking because the words that are coming out of your brain and into your fingers and then posted onto the internet don't actually make any sense in any form of reality that any person here lives in.

I'm posting. So I'm not banned. And I literally was in game like two minutes ago. So. I'm not banned.

What the fuck are you talking about you crazy crazy person?

[Sethius Marlowe]

Oh my god. I just read your post history.

You literally are a crazy person. You're like, clinically absolutely crazy pants. In like a science way. Not like a subjective way.

Holy shit.

Your honor, the People apologize to the court for taking time to acknowledge this absolutely demented person. Please carry on.

[solleks]

Originally Posted by Sethius Marlowe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh my god. I just read your post history.

You literally are a crazy person. You're like, clinically absolutely crazy pants. In like a science way. Not like a subjective way.

Holy shit.

Your honor, the People apologize to the court for taking time to acknowledge this absolutely demented person. Please carry on.

U haven't even seen my best work but at least I'm not banned like you

[Polycaster]

Originally Posted by Sethius Marlowe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The people declare that Nirgon does not understand how to read, and thereby is possible unable to identify that Ramal Modo is Lamar Odom backwards. Lamar Odom, as the court will hear, is a famous african american basketball player.

The charges have been thrown out, as it is self-evident what the name spells backwards. It is effectively asked and answered. Or to restate it to be in keeping with the DMO theme, it has been axed and answered.

All that remains is whether the accused intended to use the name backwards, but there is no way to determine intent. The court is loathe to ascribe a mental state with no facts in evidence, and so the case is dismissed with prejudice.

Originally Posted by Sethius Marlowe [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh my god. I just read your post history.

You literally are a crazy person. You're like, clinically absolutely crazy pants. In like a science way. Not like a subjective way.

Thinking science isn't subjective is objectively crazy. Google 'lysenkoism.' Or 'global warming debunked.'

[Smellybuttface]

Originally Posted by Polycaster [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The charges have been thrown out, as it is self-evident what the name spells backwards. It is effectively asked and answered. Or to restate it to be in keeping with the DMO theme, it has been axed and answered.

All that remains is whether the accused intended to use the name backwards, but there is no way to determine intent. The court is loathe to ascribe a mental state with no facts in evidence, and so the case is dismissed with prejudice.

Thinking science isn't subjective is objectively crazy. Google 'lysenkoism.' Or 'global warming debunked.'

This is a civil trial, and I would argue given the lower threshold for evidentiary proof than a criminal trial, by a preponderance of the evidence a jury could reasonably infer the defendant's intent. In this case, fraudulent misrepresentation. An expert witness could testify as to the statistical improbability of making the name completely randomly without knowledge of the truth. With this information, the jury would infer that a reasonable person in the defendant's position had knowledge that the representation was false.

Add in the compounding circumstance that the defendant had not one, but TWO PhD's (though the jury is still out on the falsity of this claim).

Secondly, to think science IS subjective is objectively nonsense. Google 'denial syndrome', or 'climate change NASA,' 'climate change UN,' 'climate change EPA.'

[Polycaster]

Originally Posted by Smellybuttface [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a civil trial, and I would argue given the lower threshold for evidentiary proof than a criminal trial, by a preponderance of the evidence a jury could reasonably infer the defendant's intent. In this case, fraudulent misrepresentation. An expert witness could testify as to the statistical improbability of making the name completely randomly without knowledge of the truth. With this information, the jury would infer that a reasonable person in the defendant's position had knowledge that the representation was false.

Add in the compounding circumstance that the defendant had not one, but TWO PhD's (though the jury is still out on the falsity of this claim).

Secondly, to think science IS subjective is objectively nonsense. Google 'denial syndrome', or 'climate change NASA,' 'climate change UN,' 'climate change EPA.'

From the urgency of the OP I'm fairly certain this is a trial of a capital crime. With the death penalty on the table, the highest standards of evidence must be used.

[TomisFeline]

Originally Posted by Polycaster [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Thinking science isn't subjective is objectively crazy. Google 'lysenkoism.' Or 'global warming debunked.'

holy shit I Google it and read it and your right global warming is fucking made up...

I can't believe it...

[Horza]

Have I already been banned? Nirgon's power is genuinely frightening.