Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-01-2019, 02:36 AM
Sagus Sagus is offline
Scrawny Gnoll

Sagus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Earth
Posts: 28
Default

I'd settle for root, pet heal and half mana cost of spells
  #2  
Old 12-01-2019, 08:33 AM
AgentEpilot AgentEpilot is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Green server
Posts: 230
Default

Just give them their epics at level 1.
__________________
Frozencaux - Green Server Shaman
Gnomaldtrump - Blue Server Enchanter
  #3  
Old 12-01-2019, 08:42 AM
Meiva Meiva is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 392
Default

All your arguments lately for custom classes have been stressing me out. I sure hope your word vomit falls on deaf ears.
  #4  
Old 12-01-2019, 10:30 AM
Roth Roth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 257
Default

So ignoring the way this post was presented, I definitely want to comment on this topic. How does mages having literally no pets after 34 benefit anyone? I'm not even a mage, I'm a shaman... and pretty much every mage I ever grouped with in the 30s just disappears after they get to 40.

In what way does this actually make the game better? Because at this point it's clearly a conscious choice not to patch it. I mean, I'm just here to play real everquest man. I didn't sign up for that.
__________________
Shenethax - Iksar Shaman
Xerrick - Iksar Necromancer
Numdiar - High Elf Mage
Zekdos - Troll SK
  #5  
Old 12-01-2019, 10:34 AM
Tilien Tilien is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 363
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
So ignoring the way this post was presented, I definitely want to comment on this topic. How does mages having literally no pets after 34 benefit anyone? I'm not even a mage, I'm a shaman... and pretty much every mage I ever grouped with in the 30s just disappears after they get to 40.

In what way does this actually make the game better? Because at this point it's clearly a conscious choice not to patch it. I mean, I'm just here to play real everquest man. I didn't sign up for that.
I thought part of the problem wasn't even classic.

But they don't do stuff like decrease newbie zone spawn timers to make things more playable around here, you gotta rough it out. /s
  #6  
Old 12-01-2019, 10:36 AM
Dolalin Dolalin is offline
Planar Protector

Dolalin's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: UK
Posts: 2,565
Default

Mages on Live had no pets beyond 29 for two months after release. The situation here is actually unclassically good.
  #7  
Old 12-01-2019, 10:42 AM
Roth Roth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dolalin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Mages on Live had no pets beyond 29 for two months after release. The situation here is actually unclassically good.
I didn't play in the two months of release. I'm here to play everquest because it was a GOOD game. I can't play with corpse runs on live or an authentic experience. Explain to me how giving no mages after 34 benefits anyone(thank you for suggesting this change btw)?

Secondly, mages just didn't level that fast in the first two months. There were probably a couple hardcore players that made it there but the situation is vastly different. The playerbase is NOT classic and therefore the restriction is substantially worse. A significant amount of players played wizards and warriors for example and grouped more, so a mage not having a pet in that time period was not as much of an issue.

No pets after 34 can ONLY be supported if your goal is to make an exact museum and NOT a good game in itself. Which then all balance changes and garbage like /list should be reverted if that's the case because this mage pet thing SIGNIFICANTLY makes the game worse.
__________________
Shenethax - Iksar Shaman
Xerrick - Iksar Necromancer
Numdiar - High Elf Mage
Zekdos - Troll SK
  #8  
Old 12-01-2019, 05:25 PM
Uuruk Uuruk is offline
Planar Protector

Uuruk's Avatar

Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dover, Delaware
Posts: 2,648
Send a message via ICQ to Uuruk Send a message via AIM to Uuruk Send a message via MSN to Uuruk Send a message via Yahoo to Uuruk
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I didn't play in the two months of release. I'm here to play everquest because it was a GOOD game. I can't play with corpse runs on live or an authentic experience. Explain to me how giving no mages after 34 benefits anyone(thank you for suggesting this change btw)?

Secondly, mages just didn't level that fast in the first two months. There were probably a couple hardcore players that made it there but the situation is vastly different. The playerbase is NOT classic and therefore the restriction is substantially worse. A significant amount of players played wizards and warriors for example and grouped more, so a mage not having a pet in that time period was not as much of an issue.

No pets after 34 can ONLY be supported if your goal is to make an exact museum and NOT a good game in itself. Which then all balance changes and garbage like /list should be reverted if that's the case because this mage pet thing SIGNIFICANTLY makes the game worse.
You're the dipshit that continued to level a class that didnt have pets past 34. We are all laughing at you.
__________________
Gobble?
  #9  
Old 12-01-2019, 06:27 PM
Obrae Obrae is offline
Sarnak

Obrae's Avatar

Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 295
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uuruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're the dipshit that continued to level a class that didnt have pets past 34. We are all laughing at you.
such an insightful person.
__________________
Infernus Draconis
Magician
The Drift
  #10  
Old 12-01-2019, 06:54 PM
Roth Roth is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 257
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uuruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You're the dipshit that continued to level a class that didnt have pets past 34. We are all laughing at you.
I play a shaman actually, moron. I just said all the mages I leveled with have quit.
__________________
Shenethax - Iksar Shaman
Xerrick - Iksar Necromancer
Numdiar - High Elf Mage
Zekdos - Troll SK
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.