![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
what makes a game suck? i'd say it's a lack of enjoyment per investment, and i hope most people still playing eq feel their investment is worth the amount of enjoyment they get.
i mean, im sure some don't meet that quota, but i hope most do. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
Turn off attack on rogue.
Get words/runes. Druids and shamans are amazing in groups, can aggro kite for rogues. Hybrid penalty vs ZEM and ZEM wins every time Don't need to stare at book, just have to have it open [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
I keep meaning to put a signature on, then I forget to...
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Last time I did classic EQ (2011 red server, obvs) I played as a cleric and we basically had a static group, which made it easier. Either our paladin or ranger would tank and they held agro super well ofc. There's less reason to play a hybrid on a pve server, now that I think about it. Back on red there were hybrids everywhere, which made for a much smoother grouping experience for everyone I bet.
hmmm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
This seems more like a commentary on how modern powergamer shitlords all rolling pet classes sucks the fun out of the game. People didn't do this in Classic and it wasn't designed for it.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
It isn't classic, but god damn I'd love if ZEMs were altered. There are so many dungeons I never experienced in the true classic era, and I likely still won't now because the risk/reward is so borked up in classic EQ nobody wants to do them.
I'd love so much for the ZEMs to be randomized every week(s) between dungeons. Don't even inform the playerbase which is which, make it be figured out just like it was way back when. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
![]() |
|
|