Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 04-18-2011, 03:12 PM
Fourthmeal Fourthmeal is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 967
Default

SZ fucking rocked.
__________________
Fourthmeal - Peace Pipe
  #12  
Old 04-18-2011, 04:08 PM
Slave Slave is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vendar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
sorry to break it to you, but SZ was not what defined EQPvP, not by a long shot. in fact, EQPvP was up and running WAY before SZ was created, and merging SZ into the other PvP servers was what effectively murdered the EQPvP server. SZ was created as a degenerate cesspool with the hopes of attracting as many scumbag talentless players as possible (mission accomplished) and confining them to one place so that the actual real PvP servers (VZ, TZ, RZ) would not be plagued with unskilled, cowardly, training, griefing scumbags that think somehow training or repeatedly killing nakeds = skillz.

have a nice day
Sullon Zek was one of the top three most hardcore pvp experiences I've had in my life. It was precisely because of the scumbags, because of the ruleset, and because of the nature of EQ. I am a far, far better player now for having played on Sullon Zek, Darkfall, and Shadowbane, among others.

SZ was created because the other pvp servers were riddled with blue server rules and sentiments. How challenging is it to kill someone with an invincible healer on RZ? RZ was an absurd ruleset, and you know it. How often did you actually get to try to loot someone that didn't have all No-Drop on them? I mean that's just the tip of the iceberg.

In my opinion, it's wicked disingenuous of you to denigrate SZ for the very things that made it a fun and challenging server. I'm sure you have never had to deal with anything tougher if you're crying over just SZ, so I'm very highly confident I'd destroy you in most any even-close-to-equal encounter in any game. That's the way talent and experience intertwine, sir.
  #13  
Old 04-18-2011, 05:55 PM
Amuk Amuk is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 821
Default

On blue if someone trains you on p99 and you petition you end up getting yourself banned for wasting Uthgaards time. No PNP pls.
  #14  
Old 04-18-2011, 05:56 PM
Vendar Vendar is offline
Kobold


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 175
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slave [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Sullon Zek was one of the top three most hardcore pvp experiences I've had in my life. It was precisely because of the scumbags, because of the ruleset, and because of the nature of EQ. I am a far, far better player now for having played on Sullon Zek, Darkfall, and Shadowbane, among others.

SZ was created because the other pvp servers were riddled with blue server rules and sentiments. How challenging is it to kill someone with an invincible healer on RZ? RZ was an absurd ruleset, and you know it. How often did you actually get to try to loot someone that didn't have all No-Drop on them? I mean that's just the tip of the iceberg.

In my opinion, it's wicked disingenuous of you to denigrate SZ for the very things that made it a fun and challenging server. I'm sure you have never had to deal with anything tougher if you're crying over just SZ, so I'm very highly confident I'd destroy you in most any even-close-to-equal encounter in any game. That's the way talent and experience intertwine, sir.
good post sir, to be fair though, i never once said SZ was not hardcore. i 100% believe that SZ was the most hardcore server that allowed PvP. i just don't think its an accurate representation of what EQ PvP is, and if SZ is the only PvP server you played on at the highend level then i feel sorry for you.

That being said however, i am saying that training, needless griefing, and repeatedly raping people 20 levels below you is not PvP, and it does not in any way require any skill, strategy, or tactics, nor does it represent true EQ PvP. there is ZERO pvp skills involved in training, griefing noobs, and raping kids 20 lvls below you. the ONLY thing that was great about SZ was the hardcoded no cross teaming (as i think u or someone else may have mentioned).

as far as you destroying me, well its pointless to argue over a hypothetical situation, but i just got my Air Jordan shoes and i look forward to seeing you on the court [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #15  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:23 PM
pasi pasi is offline
Planar Protector

pasi's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,079
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pudge [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
.. if you perused the vztz forums at all, you would know that there are rarely fraps posted of trains (like 1 per month maybe?).
Thats really a testament to how ineffective relying on Fraps is in terms of policing trains. Only the most blatant of blatant trains get caught - i.e. a bard strolling up solo to a raid, stopping to wait for mobs, then running in.

I get the argument that training will keep the population down, and I'd rather have no rules (sans MQ and what not) than what we had on VZTZ - a rulebook that was impossible to enforce.

For me, it's more an issue of knowing where you stand rather than advocating trains as being healthy. Then again, who plays Everquest PvP for the actual combat? The fun in EQ PvP is resource control and the ability to be a complete shit head to people - you can find more skilled/involved combat in literally every other MMORPG to date.

Hardcoded rules work too as long as what they prevent outweighs the ability to exploit any loopholes. Something as simple as a client crash when you aggrod more than X mobs in PoHate or PoFear would solve a ton more problems than it would create.
__________________
  #16  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:42 PM
fiegi fiegi is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,209
Default

no rules, cept no hacking imo
  #17  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:46 PM
Carnal Malefactor Carnal Malefactor is offline
Orc


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Envious [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Rules are for fucking faggots.
this.
save for hacking.
  #18  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:47 PM
Envious Envious is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 770
Default

Oh Vendar... but I did not actually play on Sullon. Thats how it was on Tallon Zek.
Swing and a miss...

Pudge, I have been guilded with you like 3 fucking times. I dont care if you know who I am from VZ/TZ.

TRAINS WERE LEGAL ON LIVE*

Fiegi has it, no rules, no hacking. JUST LIKE LIVE*

All you hardcore red players are sure showing some faggotry in this thread.
  #19  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:48 PM
Walk It Out Walk It Out is offline
Orc

Walk It Out's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 33
Default

i dont mind any ruleset, but if training is acceptable i might reconsider rolling a shaman and go with a FD class
  #20  
Old 04-18-2011, 06:52 PM
naez naez is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: s0cal
Posts: 629
Send a message via ICQ to naez Send a message via AIM to naez Send a message via MSN to naez Send a message via Yahoo to naez
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walk It Out [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
i dont mind any ruleset, but if training is acceptable i might reconsider rolling a shaman and go with a FD class
It's cool bro

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.