![]() |
|
#11
|
|||
|
Yes that's true.
| ||
|
#12
|
|||
|
Some mobs mana pools are too big. And some have too high mana regen rate.
When those are adjusted, typical CH mobs should only CH 2 or 3 times, unless they are raid mobs. Raid mobs will CH a few more times. Draining mana should work, when regen rates are reduced. H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
| ||
|
#13
|
|||
|
And some mobs don't have any mana to drain, but can still CH.
| ||
|
#14
|
||||
|
Quote:
Are mobs mana regen higher than classic at the moment? Is there a way to reduce mana regen on mobs?
__________________
| |||
|
#15
|
|||
|
@haynar:
So you confirm that this bash work as intended, it's merely a cosmetic fix that won't ever have any use in raid, correct? | ||
|
#16
|
||||
|
Quote:
I'm more surprised that p99, given how long it's been running, still has problems with this. | |||
|
#17
|
||||
|
@elwing
Quote:
| |||
|
#18
|
|||
|
Monster mana regen rates are totally irrelevant to the question of whether bash is able to interrupt spells. A low chance is not the same thing as zero chance. Has anyone had a bash WORK yet on a 55+ creature? Also, some people seem to forget that there is more in the game than just raiding. There are non-raid level 55+ spellcasting monsters that fall within the scope of this discussion.
Danth | ||
|
#19
|
|||
|
So can a gm confirm whether this work as intended? It's pretty much useless atm, is it intended?
| ||
![]() |
|
|