Hyjal ruins server wide NTOV crawl...

[Sonderbeast]

Do you think this would have worked in the reverse?

If Hyjal got all the guild leaders in a discord, had a server side aggreement to leave up NToV targets for a day for a serverwide crawl, and AM said 'fuck that', would the GM's prevent them from taking their own targets out of the pack?

No. And that's why preventing Venerate from having a say is blatantly a favoritism move.

But I like the idea of a server-side crawl nonetheless. I wish leadership would stop bitching like entitled children and go along with something novel and fun for everyone.

Fucking fuck.

[Phatez]

Originally Posted by Sonderbeast [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you think this would have worked in the reverse?

If Hyjal got all the guild leaders in a discord, had a server side aggreement to leave up NToV targets for a day for a serverwide crawl, and AM said 'fuck that', would the GM's prevent them from taking their own targets out of the pack?

No. And that's why preventing Venerate from having a say is blatantly a favoritism move.

But I like the idea of a server-side crawl nonetheless. I wish leadership would stop bitching like entitled children and go along with something novel and fun for everyone.

Fucking fuck.

Venerate would need to be able to kill mobs in NTOV to have a say. We leave them mobs with 12h grace period and they still fail the pulls/train entrance/concede them and go to bed empty handed.

Fucking hypocritical scrubs!

[Sonderbeast]

Originally Posted by Phatez [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Venerate would need to be able to kill mobs in NTOV to have a say. We leave them mobs with 12h grace period and they still fail the pulls/train entrance/concede them and go to bed empty handed.

Fucking hypocritical scrubs!

Am also fails pulls, trains entrance, concedes mobs as well. AM is just bigger and has more success. Venerate can kill NToV mobs and they have before, so your straw man for Venerate holds no merit.

[Nexii]

Originally Posted by Sonderbeast [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Am also fails pulls, trains entrance, concedes mobs as well. AM is just bigger and has more success. Venerate can kill NToV mobs and they have before, so your straw man for Venerate holds no merit.

When did Venerate ever kill NTOV mobs? Like when A/A were both suspended? Haven't seen them kill anything in NTOV in months if ever.

[Sonderbeast]

Originally Posted by Phatez [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Venerate would need to be able to kill mobs in NTOV to have a say. We leave them mobs with 12h grace period and they still fail the pulls/train entrance/concede them and go to bed empty handed.

Fucking hypocritical scrubs!

Originally Posted by Legday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Theres a 99% chance that all of the FFA targets will spawn, get insta pulled, and killed by AM and nobody else. Training ent on a pull is very rare and with 0 competition a guild like AM just ain't gonna do it.

Is that why AM leaves dragons up during Vulakk window?

[Dreenk317]

Originally Posted by Sonderbeast [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Do you think this would have worked in the reverse?

If Hyjal got all the guild leaders in a discord, had a server side aggreement to leave up NToV targets for a day for a serverwide crawl, and AM said 'fuck that', would the GM's prevent them from taking their own targets out of the pack?

No. And that's why preventing Venerate from having a say is blatantly a favoritism move.

But I like the idea of a server-side crawl nonetheless. I wish leadership would stop bitching like entitled children and go along with something novel and fun for everyone.

Fucking fuck.

Venerate did agree to the terms. Or this wouldn't be an issue and they would be allowed to contest. Lord Bob can't contest because they are an alliance, and all the guilds that make up that alliance agreed to the terms.

[Jimjam]

Originally Posted by Dreenk317 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Venerate did agree to the terms. Or this wouldn't be an issue and they would be allowed to contest. Lord Bob can't contest because they are an alliance, and all the guilds that make up that alliance agreed to the terms.

Well I sure hope no Lord Bob toons are flagged as members of guilds subscribed to the crawl agreement.

Iirc an AG flagged toon participated in a non-guild alliance venril kill while his guild was under an agreement for that mob. The guild got banned for it. I vote ban all guilds that had members facilitate Bob?

[Nexii]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well I sure hope no Lord Bob toons are flagged as members of guilds subscribed to the crawl agreement.

Iirc an AG flagged toon participated in a non-guild alliance venril kill while his guild was under an agreement for that mob. The guild got banned for it. I vote ban all guilds that had members facilitate Bob?

Probably don't have to worry about them being able to kill anything.

[Uuruk]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well I sure hope no Lord Bob toons are flagged as members of guilds subscribed to the crawl agreement.

Iirc an AG flagged toon participated in a non-guild alliance venril kill while his guild was under an agreement for that mob. The guild got banned for it. I vote ban all guilds that had members facilitate Bob?

I vote get a fucking life. Who cares who kills pixel respawn #15,000

[Argh]

I would imagine the issue is the fact that Lord Bob has silently participated in the agreement until this point, and a goal of the agreement since the beginning has been an open NToV crawl.