|
|
#12
02-06-2010, 02:19 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Abacab tells Phallax, "To be honest you're just a bunch of little bugs on my windshield that I have to wipe clean before I start cruise controlin' into phat lewtz."
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#13
02-06-2010, 02:38 PM
|
|||
|
all i know about this is we killed maestro fairly, he worked properly doing his aoe and all, we got the first monk gloves of the server (the rarest drop on maestro) then a gm shouted stuff about inny and he took back the gloves.
i feel a bit raped right now :-/ i don't know what exactly they were talking about (inny broken or something like that) but it clearly had nothing to do with our fair maestro kill, it's one of the worst gm decision on this server imo | ||
|
|
|||
|
#14
02-06-2010, 03:08 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
About 15 minutes after we had downed inny and you had subsequently downed maestro, Tibador was throwing a fit. We were currently waiting for our raid target to be re popped so we could kill him properly. Because of that, he and nilbog deemed that the raids we had in hate were moot, and either we should BOTH get an inny and maestro, roll for the targets and have them repopped, or no one gets anything. I tried to convince them that there was no issue and failed. The end result was no one gets anything. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#15
02-06-2010, 04:27 PM
|
|||
|
From a non-leader/officer perspective, it went.
End of the day, we all loss. Maybe that's a fitting solution to these problems. It blows (the entire scenario was stupid), but I'm glad to see both guilds treated equally over this, regardless of which guild was whining and which one was trying to do the right thing. Disclaimer: I am nothing but a pawn, describing the events as I saw them unfold around me. Please don't flame me for this. <3
__________________
Abacab tells Phallax, "To be honest you're just a bunch of little bugs on my windshield that I have to wipe clean before I start cruise controlin' into phat lewtz."
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#16
02-06-2010, 04:39 PM
|
|||
|
What ever happened to the first guild with "capable force" has right to zone?
__________________
 it's like you make the atomic bomb (server) and you don't want to let other countries (guilds) have nuclear secrets (under the radar information). it's gm's business and no one else's or else everyone gets nuked. letting Iran or North Korea beta test and keep the successful nukes, makes other countries uncomfortable. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#17
02-06-2010, 04:58 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
First capable force at a target has the rights to that target.. within 30 minutes. We were the first ones to inny, there shouldn't have been an issue. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#18
02-06-2010, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
After reading this I dont understand why the loots were taken away it seems everyone followed the rules.
And Goobles its first to a target has rights to that specific target. Not the entire zone. IE a raid force cant zone into Hate and claim the entire zone. I do believe it should be first raid force in zone should claim the zone for zones like Hate/Fear/Sky.
__________________
Lvl 59 Monk - Jinsho Lee
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#19
02-06-2010, 05:56 PM
|
|||
|
"I do believe it should be first raid force in zone should claim the zone for zones like Hate/Fear/Sky."
I don't, because many of the monsters in these zones do not require raids. Your suggestion would be tantamount to Guild_X owning all of SolB because it takes a couple dozen people to kill Nagafen. Danth | ||
|
|
|||
|
#20
02-06-2010, 05:56 PM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
