![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#3
|
|||
|
Nah your mom fits in the bed perfectly!
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
Economic policy has changed little and will change little under Obama, except a few higher taxes on the wealthy that actually end up hurting the rest of society more than most people are willing to understand. It's all about doing a monetary policy/spending rain dance and hoping it works while keeping the naysayers demonized and out of the mainstream perception. Bush did it, Obama does it more, and more effectively. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() | |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#8
|
|||
|
I'd contend that what he said is wildly unsupported drivel.
I'd also contend that you should do some research as to what era we were in while we had the highest taxes this nation has ever known, and what we accomplished in that era. I'd also contend that I like your avatar. Kthxbyela~
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
||||
|
Quote:
What he's saying isn't drivel. What gives the government the right to arbitrarily punish an individual for earning more than the man next to him? That is a really tough question because of the complexity of the tax code, but from what I know we started raising tax margins around 1925, plummetted into a depression, increased taxation further and further until about the mid 50's then we started dialing back down once WWII was paid for. I suppose your point is that we won WWII? Which I'm not sure I fully follow. But again, I revert to my question previously; irregardless of circumstance, what right does the government have to take excessive amounts of income from one individual and starkly less from another? | |||
|
|
||||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Krimsin, your posts are so retarded that I think we need a torch-bearing mob to deal with them. Why is there never a torch-bearing mob around when you need one?
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|