Nice move Shillary...

[Daywolf]

Move? I'm surprised she can move at all with that colostomy bag wrapped around her left leg. Her "pantsuits" can only hide so much, and cant hold the falling parts as they drag her unconscious into a van such as on 9-11-2016.

[Grimjaw]

thrown in "like a side of beef"

[R Flair]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Just had to share this video. So funny, so good, and most importantly, so accurate.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7LWJaBFIFw

[Angushjalmur]

Stop comparing hillary to someone who was, all things considered, an objectively incredible leader

[R Flair]

Jews aside, the millions of germans and others who died for holding a different opinion would beg from the grave, to disagree with you.

Trying to take over the world by force and using your people to do so, makes you objectively a horrible leader and a horrible person in general.

[AzzarTheGod]

Yeah never forget the 85 Gabillion.

Seriously though, its unfortunate Jews were placed into labor camps. But the US has done similar stuff.

Enough with demonizing 1 person. The soviets made up death camps as propaganda, American Red Cross didn't find any evidence in the camps they liberated.

There was maybe 1-2 camp where sick and dying Jews were being euthanized in Auschwitz. Again, its unfortunate about the concentration camps and the way Jews were treated, but it wasn't some grand demon design. Can we cut that out?

[R Flair]

First, I said jews aside. Even if not a single jew died, he was still a horrible leader and person and had the US not have intervened when they did, he would have nuked the world if they stood in his way (they were right behind us in a-bomb research).

No, we can't cut that out. Its the go to example of bad policies, bad leadership, and megalomania in general.

He was evil incarnate.

[AzzarTheGod]

Originally Posted by R Flair [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Even if not a single jew died, he was still a horrible leader
He was evil incarnate.

At a certain point, yes, I don't think anyone is arguing against that who is taken seriously, at least not me. He went mad.

There was a time for him to pass the torch, his constituents tried to get him to pass the torch, and it didn't happen. Too many loyalists in every branch of the military and the tyrant had to be uprooted through intervention.

After the gains in the Blitzkrieg he had a chance to start negotiations but there was so much anger over WW1 can you blame him for exacting a bit of revenge on his neighbors? What started out as a bit of revenge turned into insanity yada yada.

But you can't say he didn't "used to was" as far as being a great leader goes. I think that's a bogus statement. The economic turnaround of Germany speaks for itself (pre-Blitz, even before the Wehrmacht even began to create jobs). Let me guess, you are going to claim the seizing of Jewish property and shekels is the reason for all of Germany's economic success under the father [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]



His reforms worked. The design was working. His government worked.

[Nihilist_santa]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

1938 Man of the Year for a reason.

[AzzarTheGod]

America was in awe at the time.

It had everything to do with his economic and fiscal policy and reforms, and how it was WORKING.