Game Mechanics: Belt Haste Not Effecting Backstab (5 logs test study)

[bktroost]

Originally Posted by KorafRN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There should be plenty of logs in the other bug report thread about haste/backstab cooldown. I'm not sure if anyone really tested an RBG tho.

well if 27% haste took a 10 second to an 8 second then that means each point of worn haste is worth 0.074 seconds of refresh time. Then 41% haste should be removing 3.034 seconds of refresh time, reducing a base 10 second backstab to a standard 7 second backstab... assuming all backstabs are on a base refresh.


We actually do see a 7 second in the data. Hmm. Cecily may be right. I think we just need oodles more data and using an autofire to confirm that there is a base refresh. I should recant my server post.

[Jimjam]

Seems like there is a cap on minimum delay?

[KorafRN]

Mudwart parsed renards backstabs at 7.3s.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=240866 there are some logs in the first two pages

[bktroost]

Wait wait, this data you linked shows that the base backstab is 7.6? That doesn't make sense. It says no epic, no haste. I can't believe that.

[KorafRN]

Yeah, should be no spell haste with item haste (41%)

[bktroost]

Originally Posted by KorafRN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, should be no spell haste with item haste (41%)

Ah yes. I see. So it still seems to me we lack a "control". We need data on the base rogue with no haste.

[Raev]

41% haste should decrease the backstab timer to 7.1 seconds vs 7.87 seconds for the RBG. 0.77 seconds is less than the 1 second granularity of the log, so your experiment was somewhat poorly designed. Doing good Science isn't trivial!

I'll leave it to you to think about how to fix your experiment.

[Cecily]

I appreciate the effort.

[bktroost]

Agreed, I'll stick to politics [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Naxi]

I laughed