Game Mechanics: Belt Haste Not Effecting Backstab (5 logs test study)

[bktroost]

Originally Posted by KorafRN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There should be plenty of logs in the other bug report thread about haste/backstab cooldown. I'm not sure if anyone really tested an RBG tho.

well if 27% haste took a 10 second to an 8 second then that means each point of worn haste is worth 0.074 seconds of refresh time. Then 41% haste should be removing 3.034 seconds of refresh time, reducing a base 10 second backstab to a standard 7 second backstab... assuming all backstabs are on a base refresh.


We actually do see a 7 second in the data. Hmm. Cecily may be right. I think we just need oodles more data and using an autofire to confirm that there is a base refresh. I should recant my server post.

[Jimjam]

Seems like there is a cap on minimum delay?

[KorafRN]

Mudwart parsed renards backstabs at 7.3s.
https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=240866 there are some logs in the first two pages

[bktroost]

Wait wait, this data you linked shows that the base backstab is 7.6? That doesn't make sense. It says no epic, no haste. I can't believe that.

[KorafRN]

Yeah, should be no spell haste with item haste (41%)

[bktroost]

Originally Posted by KorafRN [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yeah, should be no spell haste with item haste (41%)

Ah yes. I see. So it still seems to me we lack a "control". We need data on the base rogue with no haste.

[Raev]

41% haste should decrease the backstab timer to 7.1 seconds vs 7.87 seconds for the RBG. 0.77 seconds is less than the 1 second granularity of the log, so your experiment was somewhat poorly designed. Doing good Science isn't trivial!

I'll leave it to you to think about how to fix your experiment.

[koros]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

41% haste should decrease the backstab timer to 7.1 seconds vs 7.87 seconds for the RBG. 0.77 seconds is less than the 1 second granularity of the log, so your experiment was somewhat poorly designed. Doing good Science isn't trivial!

I'll leave it to you to think about how to fix your experiment.

oh, oh, me! what we if test total number of backstabs in a large interval!? Say, 800 seconds?

[Cecily]

I appreciate the effort.

[bktroost]

Agreed, I'll stick to politics [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]