Suspensions and bans - Page 2

Rahnza · #1 12-12-2010, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Trimm [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because the GMs don't ban people on this server for no reason. They have a mountain of logs and server-side tracking tools to investigate each case. If a GM deems something is a bannable offense, chances are it is.

I was presented with logs that had nothing to do with the reason stated for my being banned. When I brought up facts that countered my ban, I was ignored / my thread deleted.

GMs will definately ban/suspend at their will. The project is ran like some sort of corrupt dictatorship out of the dark ages, which is sad because the spirit of the project / server is good.

KilyenaMage · #2 12-12-2010, 11:09 PM

A wild White Knight appears!!!!!!

**Rogean** · #3 12-13-2010, 01:22 AM

@ Rahnza

Yet another person posting under an anonymous name (I found not a single post in the petition forum under it) complaining about their ban providing details about something that never happened. Don't be a Reiker.

I can tell you right now, the reasons you gave for your ban are things we never ban for based on alone. When I ban someone for macroquest, we're pretty damn sure you were using it, more than just some warp and targetting logs. We also don't tell players what those reasons are.. we wouldn't be very good at stopping macroquest if we told everyone the things we caught them doing would we? They would simply tell their friends not to use those features, or change them to be undetectable.

We also have a way of detecting all versions of macroquest using a specific test that is only run once in a while on high levels (mostly during raids). Being banned at level 50 with raid gear gets the point across more than being banned at level 20.

The proof we have that we don't disclose even to bannee's are foolproof server flags, if you were caught, you were using it.

Don't use it imo.

Ronas · #4 12-13-2010, 02:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Don't be a Reiker.

WTF is reiker?

Rahnza · #5 12-13-2010, 02:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ronas [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

WTF is reiker?

Quote:

Reiker is a 30 watt fluorescent bulb. Reiker is a former freelance writer. Reiker is not skilled in the craft of writing. Reiker is also Teacher of the Year at Apopka High School. Reiker is affiliated with 2 hospitals. Reiker is a remote controlled space heater in the winter. Reiker is rated "EXCELLENT" in the following areas:

duh.

Rahnza · #6 12-13-2010, 02:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

@ Rahnza

Yet another person posting under an anonymous name (I found not a single post in the petition forum under it) complaining about their ban providing details about something that never happened. Don't be a Reiker.

I can tell you right now, the reasons you gave for your ban are things we never ban for based on alone. When I ban someone for macroquest, we're pretty damn sure you were using it, more than just some warp and targetting logs. We also don't tell players what those reasons are.. we wouldn't be very good at stopping macroquest if we told everyone the things we caught them doing would we? They would simply tell their friends not to use those features, or change them to be undetectable.

We also have a way of detecting all versions of macroquest using a specific test that is only run once in a while on high levels (mostly during raids). Being banned at level 50 with raid gear gets the point across more than being banned at level 20.

The proof we have that we don't disclose even to bannee's are foolproof server flags, if you were caught, you were using it.

Don't use it imo.

a) I wouldn't be posting from an "anonymous" account if Uthgaard hadn't forum-banned me for calling him out on fascistly deleting my posts. b) I've stated about a bazillion times that I'm Reiker, if you couldn't tell by the signature. c) No fucking clue what "complaining about their ban providing details about something that never happened. Don't be a Reiker." is supposed to mean. What about what I posted didn't happen? It's funny that you say that, and then go on and on about stuff that never happened in the case of my ban (100% guaranteed you never ran any MQ check on me, or you did and I passed and you felt like banning me anyways).

Basically, all the dumb stuff you typed in that first paragraph just turns the rest into blah blah blah.

WorldofWarcraft · #7 12-13-2010, 02:02 AM

I raged out when I got suspended, and fucked over on a spawn.

Here's what this shit community had to say:

"U mad bro?"

Apparently people think its "hip" to suck ass to the GM's and amongst certain guilds. I think it makes all you people look like a bunch of weak, cock suckers.

I posted this before, because it made complete sense in my head. This is a representation of how this server acts.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Honestly they keep talking shit about EQC and how its heavily moderated and the GMs are going to be too strict....

we already have that here, in my opinion. GM's are too buddy buddy with the "popular people".

Bored.

**Rogean** · #8 12-13-2010, 02:32 AM

LOL Rahnza == Reiker?

Wow enough said.

Uthgaard · #9 12-13-2010, 02:42 AM

If you dont like the server or how it's being run, Itchy, you don't have to come here. You've been lurking on the forums doing a total of two things. Looking for opportunities to share your wiki-genius, and watching for reasons to try to raise questions about how things are handled here.

We actually put time into making sure shit gets done right, and the strangely common assumption that PEQ db/source/tools are anything even remotely similar to this server is about as false as false can be.

If all people can do is bitch about the damned server, locking the shit down and developing it in private is sounding better by the day.