![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#12
|
|||
|
![]() It does seem like a big oversight though...
The zone doesn't seem particularly well designed to add an extra guild (though there is an empty corner that became beastlord/berserkers iirc), there aren't really any barbarian paladin NPCS, it's not a clickable option at character creation... Honestly, to me, it sounds like one of the original devs thought barby pallies was a cool idea and everyone else pretty much vetoed him. | ||
|
#14
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | |||
Last edited by SamwiseRed; 03-06-2016 at 03:50 PM..
|
|
#15
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#16
|
|||
|
![]() The Tribunal is more like a balancing force of fate, the justice they bring is subjective and not the objective knightly kind. Paladins wouldn't really have a set code to adhere to.
"The Tribunal follow a funadmental concept of cultural relativity. The Six Hammers themselves have on moral conscience, as they are the epitomy neutrality. While a High Elf would be condemned for practicing necromancy, a Troll may be sentenced for leniency towards Dwarven prisoners. Only the most serious of crimes get put before The Tribunal, for the punishment could be an eternal suffering and imprisonment within the Plane of Justice." | ||
|
#17
|
|||
|
![]() Reminds me of that episode from Red Dwarf where that timetravelling killer robot goes around judging people by their own standards to determine if they are fit to live.
| ||
|
#18
|
|||
|
![]() Honestly, I never thought any of the paladin gods made sense for the class besides mithaniel marr. The tribunal fits more than brell serilis or many other ones.
| ||
Last edited by Sage Truthbearer; 03-07-2016 at 04:26 PM..
|
|
#19
|
|||
|
![]() Barb Paladin would be sick. Slam is crazy good.
Also just mentally visualize a barb in full plate and fiery defender. | ||
|
![]() |
|
|