Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-12-2015, 03:27 PM
-Catherin- -Catherin- is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,508
Default

You had people within *your own guild* telling you guys you were making a really shady move. And you had people *within your own guild* gloating about it afterwards until the hammer came down.

Most of us didn't even need to bother say a word or even worry about it because we already knew how it was going to end up. This feels like an attempt to show what I believe to be fake shame to try and get a lesser sentence.

In the future consider your actions before you go and do something like this again and you won't have to make these fake apologies (fake imo.)

If you are truly a new entity with a new outlook on actually working together with everyone else then start to prove it. Considering your own history, I'll believe it when I see it. Words are completely empty until then.
  #2  
Old 06-12-2015, 03:22 PM
touchtonedialing touchtonedialing is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 275
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
As we considered ourselves a new entity, we simply thought we'd be a Class R guild to start, as that is what has been stated in the past. All new guilds are considered Class R. The fact that TMO is still a guild, and comprised of over 100 members still, can only prove further that we are two entirely different entities.
Same guild bank, DKP, leaders and 69 out of 74 Forsaken members from TMO but its a new entity? Really? Its a shockingly poor leadership decision and literally the first one you had to make.
  #3  
Old 06-12-2015, 03:26 PM
Ella`Ella Ella`Ella is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,273
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by touchtonedialing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Same guild bank, DKP, leaders and 69 out of 74 Forsaken members from TMO but its a new entity? Really? Its a shockingly poor leadership decision and literally the first one you had to make.
For the record, the majority of the guild bank was abandoned, the recharge mule of TMO was left with TMO, the DKP was wiped clean for everyone, and only 2 previous officers from TMO are now offiers in Forsaken.
  #4  
Old 06-12-2015, 03:28 PM
Samoht Samoht is offline
Planar Protector

Samoht's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,550
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Chest, when <Foreceful Entry> formed, Shinko was the guild leader and a former officer of BDA. The membership was also 90%+ BDA members. Did you consider FE as BDA with a different name?
A more appropriate example would be Omni spinning off and waiting for their appropriate turn at loot.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
2 previous officers from TMO are now offiers in Forsaken.
That's more than what they claimed.
__________________
IRONY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 View Post
Also its pretty hard not to post after you.. not because you have a stimulating(sic), but because you are constantly patrolling RnF and filling it with your spam.
  #5  
Old 06-12-2015, 04:08 PM
Herp Herp is offline
Aviak

Herp's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 68
Default

There's 2 blue TMO on at 4PM EST on a Friday to Forsaken's 19, stop trying to fool us with this "100 people still tagged TMO" nonsense. Seriously, know your audience. We aren't that stupid.

On top of that, how many members of Forsaken have mentioned on Twitch while streaming Teamspeak, or in tells with other guilds, or on your forums etc, that your plan was to go Class R for ~2 weeks, get locked out of everything while building your guild up a tad, then hop right back into Class C? Do we need to shove logs and links and screenshots in another thread again?

Next time heed the two dozen warnings your officers got ahead of time.
  #6  
Old 06-12-2015, 05:18 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by touchtonedialing [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Same guild bank, DKP, leaders and 69 out of 74 Forsaken members from TMO but its a new entity? Really? Its a shockingly poor leadership decision and literally the first one you had to make.
You have some very bad information.
  #7  
Old 06-12-2015, 05:44 PM
Frieza_Prexus Frieza_Prexus is offline
Fire Giant

Frieza_Prexus's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Houston, TX.
Posts: 749
Default

Interesting. I thought it was a 0 DKP hard reset. I was wrong.

Guess I should have read it better. :|
__________________
Xasten <The Mystical Order>
Frieza <Stasis> 1999-2003 Prexus
"I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me." JOHN 14:6
  #8  
Old 06-12-2015, 05:50 PM
Detoxx Detoxx is offline
Planar Protector

Detoxx's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,648
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frieza_Prexus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Interesting. I thought it was a 0 DKP hard reset. I was wrong.

Guess I should have read it better. :|
There's a difference between a new DKP system and giving a signing bonus to members who joined me from TMO. The DKP system is entirely new.
__________________
"All we really lose is one Warrior."
  #9  
Old 06-12-2015, 06:14 PM
Kaezyr D`Shiv Kaezyr D`Shiv is offline
Sarnak

Kaezyr D`Shiv's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Neriak Third Gate
Posts: 210
Default

It looks like the leaked Forsaken guild forum posts just completely corroborate everything that OP said above.

It really is too bad that Forsaken is being vilified for trying to branch out and create a new environment free of the prior toxicity that contributed to and eventually left a legendary entity extremely damaged and licking its wounds.

Given that the raid rule 17 should have been more considered, and probably brought up to a GM regarding Forsaken's intentions.

It is my belief that the class system should mean nothing come velious. A lot has changed since it's inception.

Good luck this Winter everyone!
__________________
-Kae
<Riot> Wizard☆Shadow Knight☆Cleric☆Magician..and more!
  #10  
Old 06-12-2015, 03:25 PM
Ella`Ella Ella`Ella is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,273
Default

I'm just curious how a newly formed guild is considered Class-C when the guild they broke from still has it's existing guild leader, several of the officers and over 100 members.

Is it more offensive for Forsaken to compete in Class-R with obvious intentions to quickly progress to Class-C than two obvious Class-C capable guilds that remain in Class-R and cycle lockout timers between themselves?

Chest, when <Foreceful Entry> formed, Shinko was the guild leader and a former officer of BDA. The membership was also 90%+ BDA members. Did you consider FE as BDA with a different name?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.