Nirvana was overrated.

[Nocte]

Everything Dantes said, multiplied by infinity and taken to the depths of forever.

[purist]

Bleach and In Utero are both great albums.

Also, every Foo Fighters CD has been the definition of generic mediocrity.

[Bodeanicus]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bleach and In Utero are both great albums.

Also, every Foo Fighters CD has been the definition of generic mediocrity.

This. Nothing the Foo Fighters has ever done has been remotely exciting. As a matter of fact, the only tolerable song they have is "Monkey Wrench."

[Spectre]

God I have to log in after so long of not playing this fucking game just to piss on your grave. Eff you Nirvana was awesome, Dave Grohl #1 eff you, derka derka, Ghad, alramadan derka ghad. Hasbin can suck it, derka ghad, its not about the guitar its about the big picture you small minded %^$^. Derka, i look forward to pwnin all of you in nark.

[Abacab niggah]

Bleach was ok...

But other bands from the Seattle scene including, The Melvins and Earth had for more creativity and talent but since those bands weren't exploitable in the way Nirvana was (cashing in on a culture) they simply remained underground and balls to the fucking wall awesome.

Seriously, Honeybucket rapes the shit out of Smells like Teen Spirit

[purist]

Originally Posted by Abacab *****h [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bleach was ok...

But other bands from the Seattle scene including, The Melvins and Earth had for more creativity and talent but since those bands weren't exploitable in the way Nirvana was (cashing in on a culture) they simply remained underground and balls to the fucking wall awesome.

Seriously, Honeybucket rapes the shit out of Smells like Teen Spirit

Abacab is right, Melvins rape Nirvana's face.

[Abacab niggah]

Even the Melvins performed their contemporaries songs better and more creative

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA8H_Mnfilw

[Estolcles]

I was more about AiC than Nirvana. They had more skill and talent.

That's not to say they were more culturally relevant than Nirvana, they were just, technically (as in technical skill) better.

[Abacab niggah]

Originally Posted by Estolcles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I was more about AiC than Nirvana. They had more skill and talent.

That's not to say they were more culturally relevant than Nirvana, they were just, technically (as in technical skill) better.

I think AIC was worse than Nirvana, mostly because the message sent. I get it Layne is a junkie and hit high notes while Kurt can only say nonsensical things in the form of a mouthful of marbles.

but that was what grunge was, it's what Green Jelly and the Melvins stood for and bands such as Soundgarden and AIC kind of took the piss right out of the genre by setting the milestone for alternative rock.

[Estolcles]

Originally Posted by Abacab *****h [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think AIC was worse than Nirvana, mostly because the message sent. I get it Layne is a junkie and hit high notes while Kurt can only say nonsensical things in the form of a mouthful of marbles.

but that was what grunge was, it's what Green Jelly and the Melvins stood for and bands such as Soundgarden and AIC kind of took the piss right out of the genre by setting the milestone for alternative rock.

But you're now not paying attention to Jerry Cantrell's guitar work.

Plus, message or not, Cantrell and Layne's combined harmonies were pretty awesome in a time no one was really doing that... and honestly still aren't.