Raid Suspension: TMO (Again)

[ClownGuild]

Read Sirkens post we didn't attempt to kill Hoshkar and SW after we moved them for the Druushk pull. We dropped them when our kill was done and never attempted to kill them. IB killed both SW and Hoshkar on that repop. We killed PD and Killed Druushk and then left VP to kill our bag limit outside. I get that Sirken wants to get rid of stalling in the raid environment. However TMO was never attempting to stall the mobs to kill them. We simply moved them out of the way of our pull and then never attempted them.

[Prismaticshop]

Considering TMO killed 9 out of the last 12 VP dragons, that suspension is gonna do IB good.

[ClownGuild]

I think a better rule for VP would be (Since it is unique with the number of targets and pathing). If you move a Dragon for a pull of another Dragon then you forfeit any attempts on the mob you move. We let IB have them uncontested after. Much like they trained them to zone in when they moved them for PD and then left VP after on the repop that happened Saturday. Punishing a guild for just executing a pull and then not attempting the mobs just rings kinda hollow.

[Herp]

Originally Posted by ClownGuild [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Read Sirkens post we didn't attempt to kill Hoshkar and SW after we moved them for the Druushk pull. We dropped them when our kill was done and never attempted to kill them.

Surely you /ooc'd that they were not genuine FTEs and that IB could pull and kill one of your 3 FTEd dragons, though, right??

[Tongpow]

inb4 IB eats a week vacation aswell and Asgard has free reign in VP

were obviously living in the darkest timeline folks

[Herp]

Originally Posted by Prismaticshop [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Considering TMO killed 9 out of the last 12 VP dragons, that suspension is gonna do IB good.

5 of which were freebies, and considering TMO went like 1 for 15 the week before according to guild threads, bravo. Do you live week to week in real life too?

[ClownGuild]

Originally Posted by Herp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Surely you /ooc'd that they were not genuine FTEs and that IB could pull and kill one of your 3 FTEd dragons, though, right??

Doyou even understand EQ mechanics ? Serious question. There is a thing called social aggro in EQ. When one aggroed dragon crosses paths with another aggroed dragon they talk very fast to each other and tell each other new people to hate. So had TMO dropped one of the dragons during their pull it would have trained back down to zone in and caused bigger problems (The kind of problems that IB caused on the last repop when they trained them to zone in).

As I said a better rule would be a forfeit of any attempts on the mob or mobs you move to kill other mobs on a repop. It gets rid of this petitionquest and punishing both guilds for simply executing pulls. At this point any time you touch a dragon to move it while you pull another dragon you're getting suspended with this rule even if you intend to stand down on the dragon you move for your pull.

[ClownGuild]

Originally Posted by Herp [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

5 of which were freebies, and considering TMO went like 1 for 15 the week before according to guild threads, bravo. Do you live week to week in real life too?

Funny guy. TMO has been kicking IB's butt for the majority of this year. IB had 2 good weeks out of 7 so far.

[Ravager]

TMO is upset that it's getting harder to leapfrog guilds and trivialize content.

[ClownGuild]

Originally Posted by Ravager [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

TMO is upset that it's getting harder to leapfrog guilds and trivialize content.

Uhm no. Both guilds do the same thing. Seriously. IB did it to kill PD on the last repop. So they are likely going to get suspended as well if this ruling holds up.