Spells: Imbue spells should not be diety restricted on P99

[Velerin]

Hoping not to have to make an Erollisi Marr cleric to 29 just for gems.

[wycca]

Bump.

PS - Odd tidbit, apparently imbue solro spell also had mage on it at one time. No apparent benefit, so was removed. No real in-game impact, so didn't feel like linking the research on that one. Just seemed neat.

[wycca]

Bump. Imbue not deity restricted for 2015!

[-Catherin-]

make it so!

[Daldaen]

Originally Posted by wycca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bump. Imbue not deity restricted for 2015!

I approve of this. The dude has solid evidence.

[ArumTP]

Imbued Jewelry combinations
Since imbued jewelry is restricted to being imbued and worn only by persons who
follow the proper deity, experimentation and reporting is sometimes a bit slow, and
there are still gaps in our information. The gem must be imbued by a healer of the
appropriate religion. However,any jeweler can combine the imbued gem with the
enchanted metal.

Right off that same EQ trader pdf doccument

[wycca]

Did you read post #1?

[ArumTP]

Originally Posted by wycca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Did you read post #1?

Yes, read the patch.

"Characters can no longer scribe a scroll that they can't cast due to deity restrictions."

Scribing and casting are different things. And again if you read the EQTC old website of the same era it refers in the same manner.

"The gem must be imbued by a healer of the appropriate religion."

The bug of the reads as such people were filling their spellbooks with spells they could not cast anyways.

[wycca]

Originally Posted by ArumTP [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes, read the patch.

"Characters can no longer scribe a scroll that they can't cast due to deity restrictions."

Scribing and casting are different things. And again if you read the EQTC old website of the same era it refers in the same manner.

"The gem must be imbued by a healer of the appropriate religion."

The bug of the reads as such people were filling their spellbooks with spells they could not cast anyways.

Then you didn't read the evidence links in post #1 or post #5 about what was actually going on. They still don't restrict casting due to deity restrictions to this day in EQ you know.

[ArumTP]

Originally Posted by wycca [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Then you didn't read the evidence links in post #1 or post #5 about what was actually going on. They still don't restrict casting due to deity restrictions to this day in EQ you know.

Everything refers to scribing of the spell not the casting of the spell.

Vega brings up a good point of we don't know if it worked in the fashion of you could scribe but not cast, to a change of can't scribe but cast. Resulting in a odd subset of people that ended up multicasting.

Every single post is from 2002 and forward, that is PoP era. Velious is 2000.

This isn't sufficient evidence that the way we have it currently isn't working as intended, of correct deity to cast correct spell.