petition bard swarming?

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What, you're trolling me here too? Is that your alt?

I'm not trolling you. I just really doubt you put much effort into working out a non-petition resolution with this bard.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Potus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Swarm kiting is charming a mob and having a group of mobs attack it. Doesn't work here.

AE Kiting is running in a circle while your songs do damage.

Where did people start calling AE kiting Swarm Kiting? Like what thread started this, so I can go yell at said person.

I don't know, do I need to get technical? I've never played a bard in 15 years of EQ, and never plan to. He was kiting. It was a swarm of mobs. I don't know the mechanics at all, other than he was pulling everything from everyone in the zone and killing it all. And seemed like for giggles. Looked very much like he was tracking players to do it as well. Can't tell you much beyond that I'm afraid. I know his tracking is better than druid and worse than ranger, if that helps.

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm not trolling you.

uh-huh...
You are not trying to flame out the thread with personal attacks either...
yup... [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[norova]

You're continuously refusing to address the fact that you made no effort to personally contact this player and work something out. Deru even pointed it out in plain English, and you chose to leave it out of his quote. It is very difficult to put much faith in your claims when you repeatedly ignore the most basic of steps.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by norova [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're continuously refusing to address the fact that you made no effort to personally contact this player and work something out. Deru even pointed it out in plain English, and you chose to leave it out of his quote. It is very difficult to put much faith in your claims when you repeatedly ignore the most basic of steps.

Who said I didn't contact him? So did someone else. When I said "no talk" I was speaking about the bard. This guy was ignoring everyone in the zone, running over them and swiping every mob around them.

As for the quote, I cut nothing out. You go right now to his post, hit quote, and see what gets automatically cut out. Do it.

I've many times resolved in-game differences, and am especially careful with my conduct in the game where it comes to other players and their camps or hunting space. So you guys knock it off with personal attacks and/or accusations, that stuff should stay in RnF where it belongs... or doesn't.

[averad]

Yeah guys knock it off or Daywolf will make another forum post asking what to do about this form post.

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I've many times resolved in-game differences, and am especially careful with my conduct in the game where it comes to other players and their camps or hunting space.

So how exactly did you go about resolving it? Why shouldn't we punish you and not the bard?

[norova]

Woops, that is my mistake. You did quote him properly. However, you still failed to acknowledge the fact that a GM told you to work it out with the Bard player first. If you tried that, why didn't you say so when you replied? You're not making a very good case for yourself.

I think most people can empathize with you as far as having a Bard take many of the spawns, but you haven't stated that you actually spoke with him and attempted to resolve the matter via direct communication. Even when replying to me you haven't said it. Trust me, I feel your pain, but you need to communicate all of the details if you want to publicly request comments on an issue like this.

[averad]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[HydroPonics]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Every encounter I've had with you on these boards makes me think massive tool, soo I'm giving the bard the benefit of the doubt here.

Cecily is Project1999's biggest d-bag and a-hole, and should be promptly ignored. Don't feed into his virgin posts. He likes to start stuff with genuine, nice players on the forums and his shitty zerg guild TMO doesn't even care. Way to represent the server with bad players such as this, TMO.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by norova [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Woops, that is my mistake. You did quote him properly. However, you still failed to acknowledge the fact that a GM told you to work it out with the Bard player first. If you tried that, why didn't you say so when you replied? You're not making a very good case for yourself.

I think most people can empathize with you as far as having a Bard take many of the spawns, but you haven't stated that you actually spoke with him and attempted to resolve the matter via direct communication. Even when replying to me you haven't said it. Trust me, I feel your pain, but you need to communicate all of the details if you want to publicly request comments on an issue like this.

wut?

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So how exactly did you go about resolving it? Why shouldn't we punish you and not the bard?

Well, how have I responded in this thread to you? You open up with personal attacks, and I defy you with reasoning, not returning your frivolous attacks with frivolous attacks melting the thread to RnF. Pretty much same thing in any thread we lock horns. I provide a reasonable argument to someone, a friendly debate, not even having a conversation with you, you jump in and start flaming as that's all you have. So, your questions, I only see treachery lurking behind them. Go away troll.