![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
![]() Sunday night fight night, win by technical decision!
Tune in to see the results!
__________________
-Glasken, coming out of retirement for Green99
![]() | ||
|
#12
|
|||
|
![]() Sounds weak. AG will be suspended on their next Class R Sev (not ffa since it's already been done before to another guild this month). No idea on Taken. Maybe they just gained agro due to AG tracker going full retard, and not fully their fault. We shall see. Not much drama tbh.
| ||
|
#13
|
|||
|
![]() Taken did nothing wrong by killing another guilds improperly engaged dragon. Leave Taken alone! You're all just jealous you didn't think of killing it first.
__________________
Butchh | Facetious | Knockers Jayce | Briefs | Squash | ||
|
#14
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#15
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | |||
|
#16
|
|||
|
![]() WTS: Lawyering Servies. Hourly rate is negotiable. PST Unbrella.
| ||
|
#17
|
|||
|
![]() A strict reading of the rules and application of precedent would hold that it was AG's kill and Taken killed AG's dragon. Since Taken killed the dragon without FTE, loot is destroyed, raid suspension may also apply, but rulings seem to have been inconsistent. AG, having engaged a dragon illegally, may also be suspended but there's no precedent either way.
What is clear (and was explicitly stated by GM's in the Faydedar incident) is that there is no gray area about killing a dragon without FTE and Taken didn't have it. | ||
|
#18
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
SO, they kill a mob they don't have FTE on and they DO NOT GET A SUSPENSION? Wha? | |||
|
#20
|
|||||
|
![]() please refrain from doing things on sundays
__________________
Ever wonder what Braknar does around here? - https://youtu.be/WTtFXBgggpI
Sirken's Twitch Stream - www.twitch.tv/sirken_ Quote:
Quote:
![]() | ||||
|
![]() |
|
|