Civ 5

[Cookiefist]

Originally Posted by Visual [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Consensus amongst everyone I know is Civ 4 was better. Losing the ability to attach Generals to units was a major blunder imo.

True. I find generals to be useless in civ 5. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I dont even think they can attack!

[nilbog]

Originally Posted by Visual [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Consensus amongst everyone I know is Civ 4 was better.

I liked 4 better.

I was mostly a culture player in 4, and 5 is weird because of the tourism thing. Now instead of border growth, its racing with Darius for Chichen Itza and Golden Ages to get tourism.