Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:07 PM
sanforce sanforce is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 323
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrano [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Hey remember that time you made a guild to overthrow TMO and then joined them? Good times.
Isn't your Rogue in TMO?
  #2  
Old 04-01-2014, 06:34 PM
lilyanna lilyanna is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 257
Default

Alarti given that my comprehension of English is better than yours.. pretty much /fail troll on your behalf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #3  
Old 04-01-2014, 06:35 PM
Sajan Sajan is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,417
Default

[QUOTE=Tasslehofp99;1394449][You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.][QUOTE]
  #4  
Old 04-01-2014, 06:39 PM
captain captain is offline
Sarnak

captain's Avatar

Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 211
Default

These tears are delicious!
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
Blue Server
Mender - High Priest of Tunare
Alola - Grandmaster
Huock - Warlord of Rallos Zek
Rozenwyn - Preserver of Tunare
Barterer - EC Trader Extraordinaire

Discord - Drock#9316
  #5  
Old 04-02-2014, 10:18 AM
thefloydian thefloydian is offline
Kobold

thefloydian's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 160
Default

Nerds.
  #6  
Old 04-01-2014, 06:39 PM
Zapatos Zapatos is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: The Ruins of Kunark
Posts: 224
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Come on guys, we raided together for months during FE/Ib's alliance. You guys repaid us with disrespect and more or less backstabbed us when it mattered most
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ella`Ella [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Actually, FE and TMO had discussed a merger about a month before it happened
Who backstabbed who again?
  #7  
Old 04-01-2014, 06:50 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zapatos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Who backstabbed who again?
It was clear from the outset of any talks of merging that IB was set on strongarming FE into doing what was best for IB, and not FE/IB collectively. There was no negotiation in the sense that Getsome had his terms initially, and then kept changing them until eventually people in FE were unwilling to even share a tag with a "leader" such as him.

You and I both know that TMO isn't the same guild that WE battled together in VP under the same tag. We also both know that IB was a crippled guild in terms of raiding when they came back to P99. FE helped revive them, and also had no hard feelings when many longtime FE members jumped ship back to the IB tag. You guys couldn't even show us enough respect to have fair terms for a merger, or stick to your original proposals.

Stop making this about 1 line RNF quips when you know that theres a lot more to it than that.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #8  
Old 04-01-2014, 06:53 PM
Cyrano Cyrano is offline
The Protector of Sunder


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 939
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It was clear from the outset of any talks of merging that IB was set on strongarming FE into doing what was best for IB, and not FE/IB collectively. There was no negotiation in the sense that Getsome had his terms initially, and then kept changing them until eventually people in FE were unwilling to even share a tag with a "leader" such as him.

You and I both know that TMO isn't the same guild that WE battled together in VP under the same tag. We also both know that IB was a crippled guild in terms of raiding when they came back to P99. FE helped revive them, and also had no hard feelings when many longtime FE members jumped ship back to the IB tag. You guys couldn't even show us enough respect to have fair terms for a merger, or stick to your original proposals.

Stop making this about 1 line RNF quips when you know that theres a lot more to it than that.
You took the exact same merger from TMO that we offered. 100% the exact same merger. Why is it disrespectful for us to decline co-leadership while giving you even officer count and full membership to all members but the same isn't true for TMO?

The simple truth is the FE leaders didn't deserve leadership of any raid guild and the fact that they aren't co-leader in TMO is further proof of this.
  #9  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:04 PM
Tasslehofp99 Tasslehofp99 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 2,314
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyrano [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You took the exact same merger from TMO that we offered. 100% the exact same merger. Why is it disrespectful for us to decline co-leadership while giving you even officer count and full membership to all members but the same isn't true for TMO?

The simple truth is the FE leaders didn't deserve leadership of any raid guild and the fact that they aren't co-leader in TMO is further proof of this.
IB should've treated FE as equals in any merger discussions. Especially after we revived your crippled guild and dealt with splitting loots evenly with an uneven amount of effort/numbers put forth from IB. The only one officer IB that ever went above and beyond the call of duty to do anything for either guild was Hokushin, the rest are just figureheads with well known names.

I honestly have pity for most members of IB, after what has happened. Many of us are/have been friends for years. It's pretty sad that poor leadership by IB's officers forces their members to suffer in such a way as this.

Alas, the past is the past. Time for you guys to move on even though you must be pretty salty that FE didn't just roll over for your guild leader's disrespect.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid
Barlow - 60 monk
Blueberrii - 60 Mage
Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman
Kids - 60 Rogue
Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric
  #10  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:05 PM
Pheer Pheer is offline
Fire Giant

Pheer's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 858
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tasslehofp99 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
IB should've treated FE as equals in any merger discussions. Especially after we revived your crippled guild and dealt with splitting loots evenly with an uneven amount of effort/numbers put forth from IB. The only one officer IB that ever went above and beyond the call of duty to do anything for either guild was Hokushin, the rest are just figureheads with well known names.

I honestly have pity for most members of IB, after what has happened. Many of us are/have been friends for years. It's pretty sad that poor leadership by IB's officers forces their members to suffer in such a way as this.

Alas, the past is the past. Time for you guys to move on even though you must be pretty salty that FE didn't just roll over for your guild leader's disrespect.
poor leadership by IB? LOL

Your guild leader ran your tag into the ground and literally put you in a position where you could no longer exist as Forceful Entry anymore. And you're thankful to him for it.
__________________
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.