![]() |
#11
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
|
#12
|
|||
|
![]() Voyager was alright in it's own way I suppose. Rest assured though, had Picard been in command of Voyager when it encountered the Caretaker shit would have been handled differently (read: Better). I never cared for the female command tbh.
| ||
|
#13
|
|||
|
![]() Learn to make proper use of the word canon and we might be able to continue this discussion at a later venue.
Until then, I still await a response from Tiggles. A ban/clearing was issued immediately after he was called out for being the beta male he is. The founders demand to know who his admin persons is. | ||
|
#14
|
|||
|
![]() Persona.
Fuck subspace | ||
|
#15
|
|||
|
![]() subscribed 5 stars
| ||
|
#16
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
http://m.imdb.com/title/tt0106145/ 1993-1999 http://m.imdb.com/title/tt0187636/ 1999-2003 Who stole what? Ds9 was meant to be completely different than Tng dawg. Voyager is what happens when TNG gets stale. They used tons of old TNG scripts for voyager
__________________
![]() Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee | |||
|
#17
|
|||
|
![]()
__________________
![]() Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee | ||
|
#18
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
And I agree with all your points. Just that imo, ds9 was the weakest of them all. Mostly(entirely) because Sisko disrespected Picard in episode 1. | |||
|
#19
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Voyager was 80% filler and constantly contradicting itself. | |||
|
#20
|
|||
|
![]() I can honestly say I preferred Enterprise to DS9, hands down. Archer was easier to relate to, more personable and Scott Bakula is a relatively normal person irl. While Sisko was 1. angry at picard. 2. mad at the federation for sticking him with ds9 command. 3. Avery Brooks is a fucking weirdo irl.
| ||
|
![]() |
|
|