Was xp nerfed

[Faerie]

You guys are paranoid.

[Vile]

hope not

[AmukTZ]

Xp is less that's for certain

[Squire]

as a paladin who wears patchwork for the most part while sololing through hell levels i support this..



lol wait, no i don't. this sux.

[Kergan]

GMs said yesterday in game the XP was NOT nerfed...at least on purpose...

[Azure]

Also a good compromise - just take the exp out for the low game (people will hardly notice) and leave it in for the 51+ group for mental welfare.

Believe it or not, I want u guyz to be happy. I just think it shouldn't be at the expense of the server/everyone/box/classic.

And TBH I don't think hybrid exp penalties are good either.

[Zalaerian]

Low end is who needs it more...w/o plvl and twinkage 1-30 is brutal for new players

[Azure]

Originally Posted by Zalaerian [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Low end is who needs it more...w/o plvl and twinkage 1-30 is brutal for new players

So move the wall to 30 instead of 52. 30 is a solid level to stall people at for pvp/grps. And most classes can farm their own gear at 30~ so even if exp is slow progression is to be had.

I've had a lot of good groups 30+ on this server because 30 is a hell level. Seems people do seek out groups at those levels in high ZEM zones. There's always pvp 2 be had while some 30+ grinds out gatorscales in guk or some melee kiting in MM or some clr soloing in unrest :P

Couple that with no hybrid penalty + hotzone or two and I think server will feel a bit more alive.

[Kergan]

I'd rather see exp reduced under 50 and increased over 50. I honestly think a lot of people "hit the wall" at 52ish because they are leveling slow as shit plus have about 100x more PVP to deal with.

[Kergan]

I just don't get this mentality. People act like when they nerf the experience it will actually attract players to form these non-existent groups. You need the players first or all it will do is slow people down plvling their 5th alt.