Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 12-21-2013, 06:41 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by quido [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I'm forming The Medulla Oblongata tonight. We're a play-nice guild focusing on attempting low-number encounters and progressing towards Velious - no dupesocking allowed!

Tanrinat is ready for an invite.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #12  
Old 12-21-2013, 08:22 PM
Lazie Lazie is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 647
Default

I just reread that thread Nilbog posted as the reason for the changes. You guys really flamed ole Tassle hard in that thread and the dude was right. It was obvious the TMO members in that thread were just trying to hold onto an advantage and had no real reason for why training should be in the game after seeing the information given by several players in that thread about what was classic..

My only question is why it took 4 months after that information was posted for the change to finally be made ? Not complaining glad it was made, but several posters posted concrete proof it shouldn't be allowed then.
  #13  
Old 12-21-2013, 08:29 PM
Autotune Autotune is offline
Planar Protector

Autotune's Avatar

Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 2,470
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just reread that thread Nilbog posted as the reason for the changes. You guys really flamed ole Tassle hard in that thread and the dude was right. It was obvious the TMO members in that thread were just trying to hold onto an advantage and had no real reason for why training should be in the game after seeing the information given by several players in that thread about what was classic..

My only question is why it took 4 months after that information was posted for the change to finally be made ? Not complaining glad it was made, but several posters posted concrete proof it shouldn't be allowed then.
The reason we were given by the staff for p99s noncsr of VP was due to their shitty pathing. The people that argued against tassle's points were wrong, the people that told tassle his points were irrelevant were right.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sirken
I like to ninja edit people's Sigs.
  #14  
Old 12-21-2013, 08:41 PM
Ele Ele is offline
Planar Protector

Ele's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 5,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just reread that thread Nilbog posted as the reason for the changes. You guys really flamed ole Tassle hard in that thread and the dude was right. It was obvious the TMO members in that thread were just trying to hold onto an advantage and had no real reason for why training should be in the game after seeing the information given by several players in that thread about what was classic..

My only question is why it took 4 months after that information was posted for the change to finally be made ? Not complaining glad it was made, but several posters posted concrete proof it shouldn't be allowed then.
The server staff said the "Non-CSR" VP rule on P99 had nothing to do with the "non-CSR" rules from live. They were separate and distinct. That has since been rectified with today's post from the server staff. Both sides were correct and incorrect to different points and it turned into a matter of semantics.

This was Rogean's post on the first page of that thread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You seem to think that our "No CSR" rule is related to SOE's "No Guide" Rule (Maybe also called "No CSR"). The live version was a list of zones that guides could not enter due to the possibility that they may unintentionally interfere with the players.

This is not the same. Our "No CSR" Rule was not put in place to mimick live's, it is a separate rule in place for separate reasons. Therefor, your comparison to any relative eqlive policy is invalid.

Disclaimer: This post was made to correct the misconception that the rule was based on an eqlive policy, which is not. I am not posting to say that we would or wouldn't consider removing our "No CSR" policy, which may or may not be up for reconsideration.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:23 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.