Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazie
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I just reread that thread Nilbog posted as the reason for the changes. You guys really flamed ole Tassle hard in that thread and the dude was right. It was obvious the TMO members in that thread were just trying to hold onto an advantage and had no real reason for why training should be in the game after seeing the information given by several players in that thread about what was classic..
My only question is why it took 4 months after that information was posted for the change to finally be made ? Not complaining glad it was made, but several posters posted concrete proof it shouldn't be allowed then.
|
The server staff said the "Non-CSR" VP rule on P99 had nothing to do with the "non-CSR" rules from live. They were separate and distinct. That has since been rectified with today's post from the server staff. Both sides were correct and incorrect to different points and it turned into a matter of semantics.
This was Rogean's post on the first page of that thread:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
You seem to think that our "No CSR" rule is related to SOE's "No Guide" Rule (Maybe also called "No CSR"). The live version was a list of zones that guides could not enter due to the possibility that they may unintentionally interfere with the players.
This is not the same. Our "No CSR" Rule was not put in place to mimick live's, it is a separate rule in place for separate reasons. Therefor, your comparison to any relative eqlive policy is invalid.
Disclaimer: This post was made to correct the misconception that the rule was based on an eqlive policy, which is not. I am not posting to say that we would or wouldn't consider removing our "No CSR" policy, which may or may not be up for reconsideration.
|