Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-09-2013, 08:40 PM
Noselacri Noselacri is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 422
Default

There's still no real reason to restrict classes. What possible purpose would it serve?
  #12  
Old 11-09-2013, 08:44 PM
Rec Rec is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 633
Default

It serves the purpose of breaking up the super leet people who want to play these other classes. You want them all on the same team again stick to ded99.
  #13  
Old 11-09-2013, 09:17 PM
Vexenu Vexenu is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,225
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Noselacri [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
There's still no real reason to restrict classes. What possible purpose would it serve?
It adds flavor to the game, makes team choice more meaningful, and adheres to the game's lore (an important but undervalued consideration).

It's also classic.

And in practice it's just nice to have actual differences between the teams. Makes the server feel like more of a war rather than just a random assortment of people killing each other for no apparent reason.

The class differences result in tactical and strategic differences as well, which is most notable with the Evil team's lack of Druids. Without Druids, Evils must rely on Wizards for ports and Shamans for SoW. This makes them considerably less mobile than Goods and Neuts, who can get both from a Druid (especially since Druids, being one of the best classes on a PvP server, are everywhere). Meanwhile, Evils get large races and SKs to compensate, making them better in a straight-up fight but considerably less effective at hit and runs. There is a nice balance present despite the teams not being equal.

It's an interesting dynamic that's worth preserving.
  #14  
Old 11-09-2013, 09:35 PM
Fawqueue Fawqueue is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 443
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vexenu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
It adds flavor to the game, makes team choice more meaningful, and adheres to the game's lore (an important but undervalued consideration).

It's also classic.

And in practice it's just nice to have actual differences between the teams. Makes the server feel like more of a war rather than just a random assortment of people killing each other for no apparent reason.

The class differences result in tactical and strategic differences as well, which is most notable with the Evil team's lack of Druids. Without Druids, Evils must rely on Wizards for ports and Shamans for SoW. This makes them considerably less mobile than Goods and Neuts, who can get both from a Druid (especially since Druids, being one of the best classes on a PvP server, are everywhere). Meanwhile, Evils get large races and SKs to compensate, making them better in a straight-up fight but considerably less effective at hit and runs. There is a nice balance present despite the teams not being equal.

It's an interesting dynamic that's worth preserving.
This completely. One of the more interesting aspects of choosing to play in a competitive teams setting is balancing your advantages and disadvantages against both your competition and the game content. You need to have consequences to your choices or they aren't meaningful.

Some games do this through differences in weapon choices (like many shooters) or rock-paper-scissor ability distribution (like League of Legends). But a game where everything is identical across the board means my team decision was based on random selection and indifference.

Guild Wars 2 is a great example of how boring giving every team identical classes can be. The PvP was fun for about a month. I want to enjoy teams99 longer than that.
  #15  
Old 11-09-2013, 09:45 PM
Lowlife Lowlife is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 842
Default

deny evil bards, thank me later.
  #16  
Old 11-09-2013, 09:54 PM
Sirken Sirken is offline
VIP / Contributor

Sirken's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 15,821
Default

mostly a lot of really great posts/ideas in this thread, ill be lurking quietly
__________________
Ever wonder what Braknar does around here? - https://youtu.be/WTtFXBgggpI

Sirken's Twitch Stream - www.twitch.tv/sirken_

Quote:
Originally Posted by Uthgaard View Post
Accusing me of simultaneous favoritism for two opposing guilds involves a special kind of stupid
Quote:
Originally Posted by karsten View Post
going after sirken is like going to a cheerleader convention and punching the only one that bothered to talk to you
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean View Post
I've met Sirken IRL.. he ain't jelly of shit

  #17  
Old 11-09-2013, 09:57 PM
Lowlife Lowlife is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 842
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lowlife [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Evil faction starting cities

1. Grobb
2. Oggok
3. Neriak
4. Paineel
5. (Cabilis eventually, 3-6 months of Classic, 3-6 months of Kunark.)

Good faction starting cities.

1. Rivervale
2. Halas
3. Felwithe
4. Kelethin
5. Qeynos

Neutral Starting Cities

1. Surefall Glade
2. Kaladim
3. Erudin
4. Ak'Anon
5. Freeport

Neuts least appealing team initially due to lack of Shammies, so by giving them Freeport, Erudin, and Surefall you've allowed them default control over early important transportation choke points for balance purposes. All major docks/shipping areas including both side of Ocean of Tears (if not that entire zone as a result) as well as Erud's crossing would be under neutral control, giving them an additional level of attractiveness for players despite lacking Shm, as Evils lack Bards but will by default carry a robust population, whereas the Good team is the most balanced class-wise. Neuts will also, at the least, have the easiest time completing several Epics including Warrior.
No rallos bards, no weird deity barb shamen.
  #18  
Old 11-09-2013, 10:52 PM
Castigate Castigate is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 292
Default

Rather than no Rallos Bards, why not move Rallos to Neutral? Pretty sure it would give them access to both SK and some of the big guys, without actually removing anything aside from bards from Evil. To balance the gains you could either drop Karana or Tribunal to good which would kick Rangers/Druids, or Shamans off their team. If nothing else it seems like it would end up creating interesting dynamics.

For reference the original SZ teams as far as I've been able to find:
The Good Alliance consists of: Erollisi Marr, Mithaniel Marr, Rodcet Nife, Quellious, Tunare
The Evil Alliance consists of: Bertoxxulous, Cazic Thule, Innoruuk, Rallos Zek
The Neutral Alliance consists of: Brell Serilis, Bristlebane, Karana, Prexus, Solusek Ro, The Tribunal, and Veeshan.

Maybe someone else could adapt it better, I really only suggest this because I'd like the teams to feel unique, but still manage to attract players.
  #19  
Old 11-09-2013, 10:56 PM
SamwiseRed SamwiseRed is offline
Planar Protector

SamwiseRed's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Tatooine
Posts: 10,188
Default

trying to balance eq pvp is impossible

balancing teams just as impossible without making it a custom disgrace to the world of norrath. you are tampering with 14 year old lore. its like re writing the hobbit. its a sin and should be punished by death.
__________________
Current Games:
Naw
  #20  
Old 11-09-2013, 10:58 PM
Greegon Greegon is offline
Planar Protector

Greegon's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: windy city
Posts: 1,068
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SamwiseRed [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
trying to balance eq pvp is impossible

balancing teams just as impossible without making it a custom disgrace to the world of norrath. you are tampering with 14 year old lore. its like re writing the hobbit. its a sin and should be punished by death.
sam so damn wise
__________________
snake nipsskin 60 dru
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:42 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.