2v2 Tournament registration closes Oct 24th

[Aerar]

Sektor, I thought this was expressly not allowed by GMs

[Sektor]

Originally Posted by Aerar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Sektor, I thought this was expressly not allowed by GMs

on red its ok I just assumed it was ok here.

[Aerar]

I could totally be wrong, just thought I read that somewhere - I think it went hand in hand with their outlawing account selling etc

[Ele]

Originally Posted by Aerar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I could totally be wrong, just thought I read that somewhere - I think it went hand in hand with their outlawing account selling etc

Having ringers play your account during BotB is against the stated rules, but it hasn't been enforced. There are some titles that were won by ringers instead of the actual account owner.

[Sektor]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Having ringers play your account during BotB is against the stated rules, but it hasn't been enforced. There are some titles that were won by ringers instead of the actual account owner.

Well sometimes RL happens and you can't make it and you don't wanna let your partner down. If its against the rules I apologize.

[Nizzler]

Bet there are 300 signed up players.. Bracket taking forever lol.

[arsenalpow]

Originally Posted by Ele [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Having ringers play your account during BotB is against the stated rules, but it hasn't been enforced. There are some titles that were won by ringers instead of the actual account owner.

I don't even think it was in the stated rules. I was privy to hearing a GM say "so you're gonna be out of town, better find someone to play your account"

It's not like they were being coy about it.

[Ele]

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't even think it was in the stated rules. I was privy to hearing a GM say "so you're gonna be out of town, better find someone to play your account"

It's not like they were being coy about it.

At least the first few it was stated, then it slipped from the remainder of the rule sets. Really cheese though to let someone else win a title for their character.

Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Calling all Monks, Mages, Bards and Warriors. Sign up is in process for this event.
Sign up Cut off will happen on August 13th.


The owner of the account must play the character, no "Ringers" will be allowed.

The owner of the account must play the Magician, no “Ringers” will be allowed. Any account found with someone besides the registered and original owner of the account playing that character is breaking the EULA as set forth by Verant Interactive.

Originally Posted by Ambrotos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Spectator and General Rulings

The owner of the account must play the character, no "Ringers" will be allowed.

[arsenalpow]

I don't think it's cheesy, what if someone is legitimately unavailable? Too bad, so sad? Granted, I won two titles on characters that aren't mine so I guess that kind of disqualifies me from the conversation since I'm obviously biased.

[Aerar]

I think it should be fine if someone plays your character, but I think only the player playing their own character should get the title.

This way the partner isnt skrewed because his friend couldnt make it, but his friend shouldnt get the title because he didnt play.