Murderer of Trayvon Martin pulls knife and gun on his in-laws.

[Kagatob]

http://www.project1999.org/forums/showthread.php?t=121622

Thread redundant, moss delete HBB's please.

[Guttzs]

Originally Posted by Hasbinbad [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/201...involving-gun/

Associated Press reports that Zimmerman allegedly violently threatened his estranged wife, Shellie, and her father first with a knife, punched the father-in-law in the nose, and pulled out his gun at her parents’ house in Lake Mary, Central Florida, just days after Shellie filed for divorce. Although police have released Zimmerman, they did take away his gun.

didnt read

[Kagatob]

This threads title is also extremely misleading. The man Trayvon responded to words with physical assault was acquired of the murder charges.

[Kagatob]

By a jury not of his peers I should add.

[Tiggles]

No charges filed, wife admitted she lied did not see a gun nor had any weapon brandished at her or her family.

Zimmerman is back at home.

Can't flim flam the zim zam

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

3 of whom thought he was guilty

Yes, females (mothers) with a pre-disposition who went into the courtroom with that exact state of mind. Something always welcomed and appreciated in courts of law. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

but didn't think the evidence was sufficient.

Glad to know you have your priorities straight. Gonna start race bating again too?

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ad-hominem shit post

K.

[Kagatob]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So, women are stupid, black people are all thugs, gays are evil, guns are good, Fox is real news, whites are oppressed,

Failspin. On point learn what jury of your peers means and why it's so important.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

3 of whom thought he was guilty, but didn't think the evidence was sufficient. Keep watching your pedo cartoons, kid, and let the adults discuss these things.

Do you realize that sufficiency of evidence is how we determine guilt in this country? If they didn't think the evidence was sufficient, they didn't think he was guilty of the crime he was charged with. Guilty of a great many other things, I'm sure, but not murder or manslaughter.

[Orruar]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're stupid. Have you been 99% sure that someone did something, but couldn't prove it? You're welcome. He was definitely guilty of manslaughter, but in White Flight Florida, you can get away with manslaughter, as long as the person shooting has a drop of white blood, and the the dead person is black. 5 of the jurors were white. That wasn't a coincidence.

On the first point of whether I've been sure someone did something, but couldn't prove it... If I can't prove it to myself, then I'm not sure of the guilt. It would seem a strange way to go through life believing in things without having some kind of justification. Certainly we have instincts and intuition, which are vital, but they should only be used an creative mechanism for considering new ideas, which then must be put to the test of logical scrutiny.

Also, it seems strange that you would be so sure about his guilt. "Definite" is most certainly more than 99% sure, which seems rather unlikely in this case. Based on my limited knowledge of what happened that night (the same knowledge you have), I'd put it closer to 5% chance that a guy with a gun decided to start a fist fight, and not the sizzurp drinking thug with a rather lengthy history of fighting. And that 5% is only because Zimmerman seems rather dumb and has his own history (and present) of violence. Put any reasonably intelligent person in there and it would drop to near 0% fast.

[fullmetalcoxman]

Originally Posted by Bodeanicus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're stupid. Have you been 99% sure that someone did something, but couldn't prove it? You're welcome. He was definitely guilty of manslaughter, but in White Flight Florida, you can get away with manslaughter, as long as the person shooting has a drop of white blood, and the the dead person is black. 5 of the jurors were white. That wasn't a coincidence.

In what crazy world do you live in that Zimmerman is white? He's hispanic. And the only reason you care at all is because Trayvon was black. If it was another black dude that shot him no one would give a shit, I doubt anyone would have even heard about it.